0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Microplastics from road markings in the presence of tyre wear – a laboratory test method development

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed an analytical procedure combining a temperature gradient method and ICP-OES to distinguish road marking wear from tyre wear particles, validating it on a wear simulator and finding that glass beads in road markings act protectively, delaying microplastic release, and that emissions vary enormously across different road marking materials.

Polymers

Road markings were reported as meaningful contributors to microplastic pollution, but recent field research indicated that the prior theoretical calculations overestimated the emissions by order of magnitude. The absence of a dependable laboratory test method to distinguish road markings wear from tyre wear was hindering studies of this topic; while larger particles of road markings could be distinguished based on the embedded glass beads, smaller fragments could not be reliably separated and apportioned. We report development of analytical procedure, comprising temperature gradient method and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy, as suitable to distinguish between the tyre and road marking wear. To validate it, road marking samples with known composition were subjected to testing at wear simulator. Periodically, various road markings were evaluated for retroreflectivity and wear and the abraded residue was collected and analysed. Good correlation was found between the extent of abrasion and the measured emissions. Amongst noteworthy results are also: (1) enormous dissimilarities between different materials – between 70 and ¿6000 revolutions of the wear simulator were needed before microplastics release commenced, and (2) the protective role of glass beads – as long as they were present, no meaningful abrasion of the paint layer was occurring and the quantity of collected microplastics was negligible. The previously suggested use of retroreflectivity decrease below a threshold value as an indicator of possible emissions was not fully sufficient because in some cases the glass beads were damaged but not extracted from the film; in addition, it was not reliable in case of thermoplastic road markings that are designed for slow abrasion during usage. The finding related to the differences in service life of various road markings and the protective role of glass beads emphasise the need to select appropriately durable materials and the necessity to maintain them appropriately. Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/551418/document

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics from road markings in the presence of tyre wear – a laboratory test method development

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed an analytical procedure combining a temperature gradient method and ICP-OES to distinguish road marking wear from tyre wear particles, validating it on a wear simulator and finding that glass beads in road markings act protectively, delaying microplastic release, and that emissions vary enormously across different road marking materials.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics from road markings: the loss of drop-on glass beads as a signal of emissions

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated microplastic emissions from road marking abrasion under controlled laboratory conditions, finding that glass beads applied to road marking surfaces play a protective role that reduces MP loss in field conditions, with results quantifying drop-on bead loss as a signal of emission rates.

Article Tier 2

Environmental transport and sorting of glass retroreflective microbeads and their potential as proxies for road marking paints

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers analyzed the concentration, sorting, and transport of glass retroreflective microbeads used in road marking paints across environmental samples, testing their potential as proxies for road paint microplastic emissions. Retroreflective microbeads were found in environmental samples and showed transport patterns consistent with being road-marking-derived, providing a novel tracer for this undercharacterized source of road-associated microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics and road markings: the role of glass beads and loss estimation

AI summary Read the abstract

Field and laboratory assessment of road marking wear found that retroreflectivity failures cause markings to be renewed before plastic-bearing paint layers are significantly abraded, resulting in microplastic emissions of only 0.1 to 4.3 g/person/year at most locations -- far below previously reported estimates.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper