We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics from road markings in the presence of tyre wear – a laboratory test method development
Summary
Researchers developed an analytical procedure combining a temperature gradient method and ICP-OES to distinguish road marking wear from tyre wear particles, validating it on a wear simulator and finding that glass beads in road markings act protectively, delaying microplastic release, and that emissions vary enormously across different road marking materials.
Road markings were reported as meaningful contributors to microplastic pollution, but recent field research indicated that the prior theoretical calculations overestimated the emissions by order of magnitude. The absence of a dependable laboratory test method to distinguish road markings wear from tyre wear was hindering studies of this topic; while larger particles of road markings could be distinguished based on the embedded glass beads, smaller fragments could not be reliably separated and apportioned. We report development of analytical procedure, comprising temperature gradient method and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy, as suitable to distinguish between the tyre and road marking wear. To validate it, road marking samples with known composition were subjected to testing at wear simulator. Periodically, various road markings were evaluated for retroreflectivity and wear and the abraded residue was collected and analysed. Good correlation was found between the extent of abrasion and the measured emissions. Amongst noteworthy results are also: (1) enormous dissimilarities between different materials – between 70 and ¿6000 revolutions of the wear simulator were needed before microplastics release commenced, and (2) the protective role of glass beads – as long as they were present, no meaningful abrasion of the paint layer was occurring and the quantity of collected microplastics was negligible. The previously suggested use of retroreflectivity decrease below a threshold value as an indicator of possible emissions was not fully sufficient because in some cases the glass beads were damaged but not extracted from the film; in addition, it was not reliable in case of thermoplastic road markings that are designed for slow abrasion during usage. The finding related to the differences in service life of various road markings and the protective role of glass beads emphasise the need to select appropriately durable materials and the necessity to maintain them appropriately. Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/551418/document
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics from road markings in the presence of tyre wear – a laboratory test method development
Researchers developed an analytical procedure combining a temperature gradient method and ICP-OES to distinguish road marking wear from tyre wear particles, validating it on a wear simulator and finding that glass beads in road markings act protectively, delaying microplastic release, and that emissions vary enormously across different road marking materials.
Microplastics from road markings: the loss of drop-on glass beads as a signal of emissions
Researchers investigated microplastic emissions from road marking abrasion under controlled laboratory conditions, finding that glass beads applied to road marking surfaces play a protective role that reduces MP loss in field conditions, with results quantifying drop-on bead loss as a signal of emission rates.
Microplastics and road markings: the role of glass beads and loss estimation
Field and laboratory assessment of road marking wear found that retroreflectivity failures cause markings to be renewed before plastic-bearing paint layers are significantly abraded, resulting in microplastic emissions of only 0.1 to 4.3 g/person/year at most locations -- far below previously reported estimates.
Environmental transport and sorting of glass retroreflective microbeads and their potential as proxies for road marking paints
Researchers analyzed the concentration, sorting, and transport of glass retroreflective microbeads used in road marking paints across environmental samples, testing their potential as proxies for road paint microplastic emissions. Retroreflective microbeads were found in environmental samples and showed transport patterns consistent with being road-marking-derived, providing a novel tracer for this undercharacterized source of road-associated microplastic pollution.
Erosion of road markings in Croatia and estimate of contribution to microplastic pollution
Researchers quantified the erosion of road markings across Croatia to estimate their contribution to microplastic pollution. By surveying markings of various types and ages, they found measurable losses of material that translate into significant microplastic emissions over time. The study suggests that road marking wear is an overlooked but meaningful source of microplastic contamination in the environment.