0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Microplastics contamination in terrestrial wildlife: the study in carcasses and feces of vertebrate species in western Thailand

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2024 Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Prateep Duengkae, Jiraporn Teampanpong, Darinee Samranruen, Montita Inja

Summary

Researchers examined microplastic accumulation in terrestrial wildlife carcasses and fecal samples from protected and non-protected areas of western Thailand, finding contamination in multiple species. The presence of microplastics in wildlife from protected areas highlights the inability of conservation boundaries to shield fauna from pervasive plastic pollution.

Plastic pollution in terrestrial wildlife poses a novel conservation challenge, with limited research available, particularly in protected areas (PAs). This study examines the accumulation of microplastics (MPs) in terrestrial wildlife both within and outside PAs of western Thailand by analyzing carcasses and feces. Researchers collected road-killed vertebrates in good condition, live tadpoles, and feces of terrestrial vertebrate species to study their exposure to plastic pollution. MPs over 50 μm were examined. MPs were found in 111 out of 136 vertebrate samples across 44 out of 48 species, totaling 387 MPs. In scat, MPs were found in 41.11 Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/559454/document

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics contamination in terrestrial wildlife: the study in carcasses and feces of vertebrate species in western Thailand

Researchers examined microplastic accumulation in terrestrial wildlife carcasses and fecal samples from inside and outside protected areas in western Thailand. Microplastics were detected in multiple species regardless of protected status, suggesting wide environmental distribution.

Article Tier 2

Using feces to indicate plastic pollution in terrestrial vertebrate species in western Thailand

Researchers examined feces from 12 wild animal species in western Thailand and found microplastics in over 40% of samples across eight species, including elephants, deer, and wild boar. The amount of microplastics found was linked to human activity near the animals' habitats. This demonstrates that microplastic contamination has reached even terrestrial wildlife in protected areas, entering the food chain far from obvious pollution sources.

Article Tier 2

Terrestrial wildlife as indicators of microplastic pollution in western Thailand

Researchers found microplastics in 92% of terrestrial wildlife examined in western Thailand, including snakes, birds, lizards, and amphibians both inside and outside protected areas. Fibers were the most common type, making up 77% of all particles found. This study demonstrates that microplastic pollution has spread throughout land-based food webs, even in protected natural areas, suggesting that virtually all wildlife is now exposed.

Article Tier 2

Quantification and Characterization of Microplastics in Wildlife Feces: Case Study from Buffer zones of Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu

Researchers collected fecal samples from wild elephants, sambar deer, gaurs, and rabbits in buffer zones of the Western Ghats, India, finding 127 microplastic particles across 12 samples, demonstrating that wildlife in protected areas are ingesting microplastics from the surrounding environment.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic accumulation in water from protected areas in Western Forest Complex of Thailand

Researchers surveyed microplastic contamination in freshwater ecosystems within protected areas of Thailand's Western Forest Complex. The study found microplastics present in nearly 99% of water samples, predominantly as fibers, with polyethylene and polypropylene among the most common polymer types, suggesting that even remote protected areas are not immune to microplastic pollution.

Share this paper