We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Differential microplastic contamination of waterbirds in a coastal region associated with trophic groups and spatial distribution
AI summary Read the abstract
A study of waterbird feces in southern Brazil found that shorebirds feeding in sediments had far higher microplastic loads than fish-eating birds, and contamination was worst near urban areas, with polyester and PVC the most common polymers detected. Trophic position and proximity to cities both shape how much plastic wildlife ingests, providing a natural monitoring system for tracking coastal microplastic pollution.
Microplastics (MPs) are ubiquitous anthropogenic particles that accumulate in coastal zones, sediments, and the water column. The exposure of organisms to MPs in these habitats may depend on foraging strategies and landscape characteristics. This study compared MP contamination in the feces of waterbirds from two trophic groups: benthivores (American oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus; white-backed stilt Himantopus melanurus) and piscivores (black skimmer Rynchops niger; common tern Sterna hirundo) in Lagoa do Peixe National Park, southern Brazil. Spatial variation in contamination was also analyzed across four breeding sites of the American oystercatcher in the region. Thirty-five fecal samples from each trophic group were analyzed, revealing 2,447 particles. Benthivorous birds exhibited higher contamination (MPs/cm²) than piscivorous birds. Additionally, 57 fecal samples from oystercatchers showed significantly higher contamination in breeding areas near urban zones. Micro-FTIR analysis identified particles mainly composed of natural and artificial cellulosic particles (NACP), as well as polyester (PES) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Differences between trophic groups highlight the impact of foraging strategies on MPs contamination, as benthivorous birds interact directly with sediments and consume filter-feeding or detritivorous prey. Spatial variation suggests that a heterogeneous distribution of MP abundance may be influenced by urbanization or dietary differences. Cellulosic particles, even when naturally derived, may be considered anthropogenic if they have undergone manufacturing processes and could pose risks similar to those of MPs. This study emphasizes the role of waterbirds as sentinels of anthropogenic pollution in coastal regions and the influence of foraging strategies on MPs contamination.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics and terrestrial birds: a review on plastic ingestion in ecological linchpins
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed how microplastic pollution affects terrestrial birds — key ecological indicators — finding documented harms including intestinal blockage and developmental disruption, with implications for entire food webs since birds that ingest plastics can concentrate and transfer contamination to other species, including humans.
Relative Importance of Microplastics as Vectors of Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals to Marine Fish and Seabirds
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used mathematical models to evaluate whether microplastics serve as meaningful delivery vehicles for toxic chemicals to marine fish and seabirds, finding that for most pollutants the microplastic pathway is negligible — though plastic additives with high fat-solubility may still pose a notable risk.
Microplastic ingestion by fish from beaches with different characteristics in a tropical bay
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studying fish in a tropical bay found that 1 in 5 fish had microplastics in their stomachs, and this happened across all species, sizes, and locations, including areas far from big cities. Even fish-eating predators (which many humans also eat) showed contamination, suggesting plastic pollution is now baked into the food web from top to bottom. Since some of these fish end up on dinner plates, this study is a reminder that microplastic exposure through seafood may be more widespread than we think, and more research is needed to understand what that means for our health.
Ecological and Public Health Effects of Microplastics Pollution
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed the ecological and public health consequences of widespread microplastic contamination, emphasizing the particles' ubiquity, persistence, and chemical diversity as compounding risk factors. The review synthesizes evidence on how microplastics harm wildlife and pose potential threats to human health across multiple exposure pathways.
Microplastics in the Marine Environment: Sources, Distribution, Biological Effects and Socio-Economic Impacts
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed the sources, distribution, biological effects, and socioeconomic impacts of microplastic pollution in marine environments, finding that rivers and estuaries are the primary land-to-ocean transport pathways. The review emphasizes that microplastics transfer adsorbed pollutants and additives through food webs to top predators, and that reducing plastic production and improving waste management are essential long-term solutions.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.