0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

A brief history of microplastics effect testing: Guidance and prospect

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2024 Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Koelmans Albert A. Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Koelmans Albert A., Vera N. De Ruijter, Vera N. De Ruijter, Vera N. De Ruijter, Vera N. De Ruijter, Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Vera N. De Ruijter, Vera N. De Ruijter, Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Vera N. De Ruijter, Vera N. De Ruijter, Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Vera N. De Ruijter, Koelmans Albert A. Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A., Vera N. De Ruijter, Vera N. De Ruijter, Koelmans Albert A. Vera N. De Ruijter, Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A. Koelmans Albert A. Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A. Koelmans Albert A. Koelmans Albert A. Koelmans Albert A. Koelmans Albert A. Koelmans Albert A. Koelmans Albert A. Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A., Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Vera N. De Ruijter, Koelmans Albert A. Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A. Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A., Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Vera N. De Ruijter, Vera N. De Ruijter, Koelmans Albert A. Vera N. De Ruijter, Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Koelmans Albert A. Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula Redondo-Hasselerharm, Koelmans Albert A., Koelmans Albert A.

Summary

This review summarized the history of microplastic effect testing and identified methodological shortcomings that have persisted across studies since 2016, including unrealistic exposure concentrations and inadequate controls. The authors compared existing guidelines and outlined a path toward more rigorous and standardized effect testing.

Study Type Environmental

Numerous reviews have consistently highlighted the shortcomings of studies on the effects of microplastics (MP), with many of the same issues identified up to 2016 still relevant in 2024. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on MP effect testing, compare guidelines, and provide an overview of risk assessments at both single species and community levels. We discuss standard test materials, MP characteristics, and mechanisms explaining effects. We have observed that the quality of MP effect studies is gradually improving, and knowledge on enhancing these studies is available. Recommendations include data rescaling and alignment for ecological risk assessment, with preference for using environmentally relevant MPs. A step-by-step protocol for creating polydisperse test materials is provided. Most risk assessments indicate that concentrations observed in ecosystems globally exceed the effect thresholds measured in the laboratory. However, using a higher-tier approach, no risks are expected for freshwater benthic communities at current MP exposure concentrations. Evidence on the mechanisms behind adverse effects is growing; however, more well-designed experiments are needed. A potential solution might involve comparing natural particles with MPs that are as similar in dimensions as possible, providing insight into the mechanisms of food dilution where volume is a critical determinant of toxicity. Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/559161/document

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper