0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

Abiotic degradation of PBAT and LDPE: quantification of generated products by carbon assessment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed industrial PBAT and LDPE plastic beads to UV radiation and water agitation to generate microplastics, nanoplastics, soluble compounds, and volatile products, then quantified all degradation products using total organic carbon analysis coupled with elemental analysis for a comprehensive carbon budget assessment. They found that PBAT degraded very differently from LDPE under abiotic conditions, with LDPE producing significantly more microplastics while PBAT's complete environmental behavior remains incompletely described despite its efficiency in industrial composting.

Polymers

Plastics are omnipresent in the environment, accumulating under the form of microplastic (MP) or nanoplastic (NP) fragments, soluble molecules and volatile compounds. To understand the scope of such pollution, studies are being performed to characterize the degradation products of plastics, qualitatively and quantitatively. Even if some degradation products have already been studied using carbon as a marker, to the best of our knowledge, no complete quantification of all the degradation products has been carried out. This study was conducted on industrial plastic beads of PBAT and LDPE exposed to UV and stirred in water causing delamination, abrasion and subsequent production of MPs, NPs and solubles. The results will be presented and compared, LDPE being one of the most produced conventional plastics and being replaced by PBAT in some applications. Biodegradability of PBAT proved to be efficient in industrial compost, but its complete behaviour in the environment isn't fully described yet. The total organic carbon method has been used to quantify nanoplastics and solubles compounds. It has been coupled with elemental analysis to perform the total carbon assessment of all the degradation products. Thanks to this new protocol, a comprehensive comparison of the abiotic degradation of the two polymers was obtained, in which PBAT appeared to degrade very differently from LDPE under the tested conditions. LDPE showed significative microplastics' production (up to 7 Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/559329/document

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Abiotic degradation of PBAT and LDPE: quantification of generated products by carbon assessment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted a comprehensive carbon-based quantification of all abiotic degradation products generated when industrial PBAT (a biodegradable polyester) and LDPE (a conventional polyester) pellets were exposed to environmental conditions, characterising microplastic fragments, soluble molecules, and volatile compounds. The study provides the first complete carbon-balance assessment of plastic degradation outputs for these polymers, offering a framework for understanding the full scope of plastic fragmentation pollution.

Article Tier 2

Effect of weathering on the release of secondary microplastic fragments and dissolved organics from microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers systematically investigated how different weathering conditions affect the release of secondary microplastics and dissolved organic carbon from PVC, polyethylene, and biodegradable PBAT plastics. The study found that biodegradable PBAT released the highest amounts of secondary particles and organic carbon, and that combined UV and mechanical aging produced the most significant degradation, enhancing particle release by up to 72% compared to either method alone.

Article Tier 2

Characterization of the degradation products of biodegradable and traditional plastics on UV irradiation and mechanical abrasion

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared how biodegradable plastic (PBAT/PLA) and traditional polyethylene break down under UV light and mechanical wear over nine months. The biodegradable plastic degraded faster but released more nanoplastics and dissolved molecules under UV light, while traditional plastic mainly produced larger microplastic fragments. This suggests that biodegradable plastics, while breaking down more quickly, may generate more of the smallest and potentially most harmful plastic particles.

Article Tier 2

NewInsights into the Long-Term Leaching Process ofDissolved Organic Matter from Microplastics: Dynamic Formation andTransformation Mechanism

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied the long-term photoaging process and dissolved organic matter (DOM) release from conventional polystyrene and biodegradable PBAT microplastics, finding distinct molecular transformation pathways for each polymer type. Biodegradable PBAT released more labile DOM that altered aquatic carbon cycling differently than conventional PS-derived DOM.

Article Tier 2

Generation of biodegradable microplastics from commercially available PBAT and PLA-based plastic bags in water: Impacts of UVA and water medium

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested how commercially available biodegradable plastic bags made from PBAT and PLA degrade in water under UVA light and dark conditions over 12 weeks. They found that both materials degraded faster in pure water than seawater, and UVA light significantly accelerated breakdown, but neither fully decomposed. The study confirms that biodegradable plastics generate microplastic fragments during incomplete degradation in aquatic environments.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper