0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Evaluation of the emission potential (microplastics & organic additives) by conventional or biodegradable mussel nets

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2024 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Périne Doyen, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Fleurine Akoueson Therese Nitschke, Bayan Almasri, Fleurine Akoueson Fleurine Akoueson Fleurine Akoueson Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Rachid Amara, Therese Nitschke, Therese Nitschke, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara, Rachid Amara, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Mathias Bossaer, Alexandre Dehaut, Périne Doyen, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Périne Doyen, Alexandre Dehaut, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Mathias Bossaer, Mathias Bossaer, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Mathias Bossaer, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara, Guillaume Duflos, Rachid Amara, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Bayan Almasri, Alexandre Dehaut, Bayan Almasri, Rachid Amara, Cristian Focşa, Alexandre Dehaut, Therese Nitschke, Therese Nitschke, Cristian Focşa, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Ana I Catarino, Alexandre Dehaut, Fleurine Akoueson Alexandre Dehaut, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara, Fleurine Akoueson Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Bayan Almasri, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara, Rachid Amara, Alexandre Dehaut, Ana I Catarino, Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Ana I Catarino, Rachid Amara, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Alexandre Dehaut, Fleurine Akoueson

Summary

Researchers compared the microplastic release and organic plastic additive emissions from conventional petro-based mussel nets versus biodegradable alternative nets by characterizing both pristine and UV-aged materials after immersion in filtered seawater for periods simulating 12 and 18 months of European solar irradiance. They found that while biodegradable nets are promoted as more environmentally friendly, both net types released measurable microplastics and organic additives upon UV aging, with the current information on biodegradable fragmentation previously undocumented.

Study Type Environmental

In mussel farming, the use of tapping nets is essential for preventing product loss and protecting mussels from predators. Plastic nets are exposed to various biotic and abiotic mechanisms, potentially resulting in their degradation and the subsequent release of microplastics into the aquatic environment. To address this issue, professionals of the aquaculture industry are developing alternatives to conventional (petro-based) plastics, introducing nets made from biodegradable and recyclable materials, which appear to be promising alternatives. Despite the challenges associated with the complete degradation of most bioplastics in the environment, these materials are supposed to be more durable and have less impact on the environment. However, the current information on the fragmentation and the release of microplastics (MPs) from these materials is not documented. In this context, this study aimed to compare the chemical signature and the release of MPs and organic plastic additives (OPAs) from both biodegradable and conventional mussel nets. This assessment was carried out on pristine materials and after artificial aging under ultraviolet (UV) radiation in seawater. Nets were immersed in 1.6 µm filtered natural seawater and exposed to UV radiations for 35 and 57 days, respectively simulating 12 and 18 months of average natural solar irradiance in Europe. After characterizing the chemical composition of the two plastic materials using FTIR, the presence of OPAs was highlighted for each condition using TD(Py)-GC-HRMS. The quantity of MPs and OPAs released into seawater for each condition was also studied. The results will provide us with a better understanding of the degradation pattern of these plastic materials to assess their fate and potential impact(s) on the environment. This will provide valuable information to mussel farmers and stakeholders at a time when changes in practices are required. Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/558999/document

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper