We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A risk assessment framework for fragmenting (micro-)plastics. A case study for polymer coated fertilizers in soil
Summary
Researchers developed a risk assessment framework for microplastics released from polymer-coated fertilizer coatings in soil, modeling fragmentation over time and rescaling toxicity and exposure data to consistent metrics. The study found that accounting for the bioavailable fraction of particles is essential for accurate ecological risk characterization.
Polymer coated fertilizers (PCFs) consist of a soluble mineral fertilizer core surrounded by a polymer coating that controls nutrient release to match with crop production cycles. While soil is recognized as a major sink for microplastics (MP), current risk assessments (RA) primarily focus on secondary MPs from sources like atmospheric deposition, mulch film debris, and biosolids. However, primary MPs, such as those from PCF coatings, enter soil directly as MPs (2 mm ≤ Ø ≤ 5 mm) and are irremovable. The extensive use of various PCFs raises concerns about potential risks to soil health. These risks can be assessed using species sensitivity distributions (SSD), which compile toxicity data from species exposed to MPs of different characteristics (e.g., polymer type, size, shape). However, not all fragmented PCF-MPs are bioavailable to soil organisms, while the often monodisperse MPs used in effect tests do not represent the diversity of actual environmental exposure. Therefore, it is crucial to consider the bioavailable fraction of MPs to organisms, and rescale toxicity and exposure data to the same toxicologically relevant metrics (TRMs) and units, for a consistent risk characterization. Here, we introduce a model for the fragmentation of PCF coatings over time, parameterized using literature data. The exposure to the increasing number of ever smaller particles is re-scaled using realignment method by Koelmans et al. and compared with Hazardous Concentrations for 5 Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/559358/document
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
A risk assessment framework for fragmenting (micro-)plastics. A case study for polymer coated fertilizers in soil
Researchers developed a risk assessment framework specifically for fragmenting microplastics from polymer-coated fertilizers in agricultural soils, incorporating fragmentation dynamics and bioavailable particle fractions. The framework found that current environmental concentrations of PCF-derived microplastics approach hazardous levels for some soil organisms.
A simplified model for size and shape of microplastics in soil: implications for risk assessment and particle measurement
Researchers developed a simplified model for characterizing microplastic size and shape in soil to address the lack of standardized measurement approaches, with implications for improving probabilistic risk assessment and fate modeling of microplastics in terrestrial ecosystems.
Assessment of potential ecological risk for microplastic particles
Researchers developed a framework for assessing the ecological risk of microplastic particles, incorporating particle characteristics, environmental concentrations, and species sensitivity data. The assessment identified conditions under which current environmental microplastic levels pose significant risk to aquatic organisms.
A probabilistic risk assessment of microplastics in soil ecosystems
A probabilistic risk assessment comparing environmental microplastic concentrations in soils with effect concentrations from toxicity studies found that current soil microplastic levels pose a low but non-negligible risk to soil biota, with uncertainty driven by data gaps in both exposure and hazard data.
Screening and prioritization of nano- and microplastic particle toxicity studies for evaluating human health risks – development and application of a toxicity study assessment tool
Researchers developed a standardized tool to screen and rank toxicity studies on nano- and microplastics by quality and relevance, addressing a critical gap in how scientists evaluate which studies should inform human health risk assessments for these widespread plastic pollutants.