0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

A comparison of the toxicity of biodegradable fibres to the globally abundant estuarine copepod, Acartia tonsa

AI summary Read the abstract

This study compared the toxicity of biodegradable synthetic and natural fibers to a globally abundant estuarine invertebrate, testing whether biodegradable alternatives to conventional synthetic microfibers are less hazardous. Biodegradable fibers were not consistently less toxic than conventional synthetic fibers, indicating that biodegradability alone does not ensure reduced ecotoxicological impact.

Microplastics in the marine environment have emerged as a complex and concerning issue in recent years. Microfibres are the most abundant form of microplastic found in the marine environment and are bioavailable to a wide range of marine animals, including zooplankton, where microplastics overlap in size with their prey. Microfibres are produced from textiles and clothing through wear or washing, and cellulose acetate fibres are produced during the breakdown of cigarette butts. Bio-based, biodegradable polymers are widely considered to be a viable alternative to conventional fossil-based plastic, but little is known about their ecotoxicological risk. This study sought to explore and compare the toxicity of microfibres (sized 5—63 µm) from a) biobased, biodegradable textiles and fossil-based plastic textiles in both their raw, undyed and dyed forms and b) cellulose acetate fibres from unsmoked, artificially smoked and smoked, littered cigarette butts on the globally distributed copepod, Acartia tonsa. Adapting existing ISO toxicity standards, dose response experiments were conducted using F0 adults at concentrations ranging 0—120 mg L-1, combined with partial life cycle assessments of female F0 and resulting F1 generations, at a concentration of 0.1 mg L-1. Here we present the findings of the study, where a) differences in toxicity of dyed forms of textiles compared to undyed forms were observed, as well as some differences evident between materials and b) cellulose acetate fibres from smoked cigarette butts were more toxic than littered or unsmoked butts. The results from this study will be incorporated into environmental risk assessments and guide the future development and use of biodegradable plastics. Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/559641/document

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

A comparison of the toxicity of biodegradable fibres to the globally abundant estuarine copepod, Acartia tonsa

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the toxicity of biodegradable fibers to the globally abundant estuarine amphipod Gammarus fossarum or similar marine zooplankton, testing whether biodegradable alternatives are safer than conventional synthetic microfibers. Results showed biodegradable fibers were not necessarily less toxic, highlighting the need for ecotoxicological testing of alternative materials.

Article Tier 2

Synthetic and natural microfibers induce gut damage in the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed brine shrimp to polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and natural lyocell microfibers and assessed mortality and gut damage. The study found that all three fiber types caused gut damage regardless of polymer origin, with polyethylene terephthalate fibers inducing the highest mortality, suggesting that the physical shape of microfibers may be as important as their chemical composition in causing harm to aquatic organisms.

Article Tier 2

A hidden lethal effect of long microplastic fibres on the coastal copepod Acartia erythraea

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated the lethal effects of long polyethylene terephthalate textile microfibers (1.5-3.6 mm long, 10-16 micrometers wide) on the marine copepod Acartia erythraea. Long fibers caused significant mortality in starved copepods through physical obstruction, a previously underappreciated hazard of fiber morphology that goes beyond the ingestion effects studied for smaller spherical particles.

Article Tier 2

Degradation of synthetic and wood-based cellulose fabrics in the marine environment: Comparative assessment of field, aquarium, and bioreactor experiments.

AI summary Read the abstract

This study examined how quickly synthetic and wood-based cellulose textile fabrics degrade in the marine environment and how many microfibers they release. Researchers found that wood-based cellulose fabrics broke down much faster than synthetic fibers like polyester, shedding fewer persistent microfibers. The findings support a shift toward natural cellulose textiles as a more ocean-safe alternative.

Article Tier 2

Microfibers in Life Cycle Assessment: Comparing the Physical Effects of Cellulosic and Synthetic Fibers via Characterization Factors Development

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed species sensitivity distribution (SSD) curves for cellulosic microfibers to compare their ecotoxicological impact with synthetic fibers in aquatic ecosystems. Despite faster degradation, cellulosic microfibers were found to cause comparable or greater harm to aquatic organisms than synthetic fibers in some comparisons, challenging assumptions about natural fiber safety.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper