0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Revealing the hidden threats: Genotoxic effects of microplastics on freshwater fish

Aquatic Toxicology 2024 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Maiara Menezes, Franco Teixeira de Mello, Lucía Ziegler, Bruno Wanderley, Juan Manuel Gutiérrez, Juliana Déo Dias

Summary

Researchers exposed a common freshwater fish to microplastics and found evidence of DNA damage in blood cells, along with changes in liver function and oxidative stress markers. The study took a comprehensive approach, measuring effects from the molecular level up to whole-organism responses. These genotoxic effects (damage to genetic material) in fish raise questions about whether chronic microplastic exposure could pose similar risks to other organisms, including humans.

Study Type Environmental

New evidence regarding the risks that microplastics (MP) ingestion pose to human and wildlife health are being revealed with progress made in ecotoxicological research. However, comprehensive and realistic approaches that evaluate multiple physiological responses simultaneously are still scarce despite their relevance to understand whole-organism effects. To address this information gap, we performed an experiment to assess the effects of MP on freshwater fish physiology from the molecular to the organismal level. Using a model species of global commercial importance (Cyprinus carpio) and MP type (recycling industry fragments), size (range between 125-1000 µm), and two concentrations of environmental relevance (0.75 and 8.25 µg/L). Experimental design included 5 blocks containing 3 treatment levels each one: control, low, and high MP concentration, with 6 fish each aquarium (5 blocks x 3 treatments x 6 fish per aquarium = 90 fish). Our results suggest that, under the experimental conditions applied, MP exposure did not cause adverse effects at the morphological (variation in size of gut), metabolic (variation of standard metabolic rate), or ecological (growth performance) levels. Nonetheless, we observed an increased frequency of micronucleated cells with increasing MP concentration (df = 42, t-value = 3.68, p-value < 0.001), showing the potential genotoxicity of MP, which can clearly harm fish health in long-term. Thus, despite being a highly resistant species, exposure to MP may generate negative effects in juvenile C. carpio at cellular or subcellular levels. Our findings highlight that the manifestation of MP effects may vary over time, emphasizing the need for future studies to consider longer exposure durations in experimental designs.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Systematic Review Tier 1

Genotoxicity and Genomic Instability Induced by Micro- and Nanoplastics: A Comprehensive Multi-Taxa Mechanistic Review.

This review of existing research found that tiny plastic particles (microplastics and nanoplastics) can damage DNA in many different living things, from fish to human cells. The plastic particles cause this damage by creating harmful molecules called free radicals, disrupting the body's ability to repair DNA, and triggering inflammation. These findings suggest that the growing amount of plastic pollution in our environment could pose serious health risks to humans and wildlife.

Article Tier 2

Biochemical, Genotoxic and Histological Implications of Polypropylene Microplastics on Freshwater Fish Oreochromis mossambicus: An Aquatic Eco-Toxicological Assessment

Researchers fed polypropylene microplastics to freshwater tilapia and found they caused oxidative stress, DNA damage, and liver tissue deterioration, with more severe effects after 14 days compared to acute 96-hour exposure. The microplastics disrupted antioxidant enzyme systems and neurotransmitter activity in the fish. The study demonstrates that prolonged microplastic ingestion poses a significant ecological threat to freshwater fish species.

Meta Analysis Tier 1

Evidence-based meta-analysis of the genotoxicity induced by microplastics in aquatic organisms at environmentally relevant concentrations

Microplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations (≤1 mg/L) significantly increased DNA damage in aquatic organisms by 20-81% across multiple genotoxic endpoints, with effects correlated to particle size, living habitat, and species but independent of exposure concentration or duration.

Article Tier 2

Toxicity evaluation of the combination of emerging pollutants with polyethylene microplastics in zebrafish: Perspective study of genotoxicity, mutagenicity, and redox unbalance

Researchers exposed adult zebrafish to polyethylene microplastics combined with a mixture of common water pollutants for 15 days and assessed DNA damage, mutation rates, and oxidative stress. They found that microplastics alone caused DNA damage and nuclear abnormalities as severe as those caused by the pollutant mixture, challenging the assumption that microplastics are less harmful than chemical contaminants. The study revealed that the fish's antioxidant defenses were overwhelmed across multiple organs, suggesting widespread oxidative damage from microplastic exposure.

Article Tier 2

From plankton to fish: The multifaceted threat of microplastics in freshwater environments

This review summarizes how microplastics harm freshwater organisms from tiny plankton to fish through oxidative stress, inflammation, DNA damage, gut microbiome disruption, and metabolic disorders. Microplastics often combine with other pollutants in water, making their toxic effects even worse. Since freshwater systems are a major pathway for microplastics entering oceans and our food supply, understanding these effects is critical for protecting both ecosystems and human health.

Share this paper