0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Effects of multiple microplastic types on growth of winter wheat and soil properties vary in different agricultural soils

Plants People Planet 2024 12 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Matthias C. Rillig Rosolino Ingraffia, Rosolino Ingraffia, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Rosolino Ingraffia, Matthias C. Rillig Rosolino Ingraffia, Rosolino Ingraffia, Rosolino Ingraffia, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Hongyu Chen, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Rosolino Ingraffia, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Rosolino Ingraffia, Matthias C. Rillig Rosolino Ingraffia, Matthias C. Rillig Rosolino Ingraffia, Rosolino Ingraffia, Rosolino Ingraffia, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Rosolino Ingraffia, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Nicolas Brüggemann, Nicolas Brüggemann, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Michael Schloter, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Rosolino Ingraffia, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Michael Schloter, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Nicolas Brüggemann, Nicolas Brüggemann, Hongyu Chen, Matthias C. Rillig Rosolino Ingraffia, Matthias C. Rillig Rosolino Ingraffia, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Michael Schloter, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Michael Schloter, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig

Summary

Researchers tested the effects of ten different types of microplastics, applied individually and in combinations, on winter wheat growth across three agricultural soil types. They found that the same microplastic type could have drastically different effects depending on the soil, and that combined microplastic mixtures did not simply add up to the sum of individual effects. The study highlights the importance of considering both soil type and microplastic mixture composition when assessing agricultural impacts.

Societal Impact Statement Winter wheat is one of the most important crops in the world. Microplastics, as an emerging pollutant, are widespread in agricultural soils due to various modern agricultural practices and can have adverse impacts on agricultural soils and plant growth. Herein, we investigated the effects of 10 types of microplastics on the properties of three agricultural soil types and the growth of winter wheat. This study contributes insights toward the conservation of agricultural soils and potential wheat yield responses to microplastic. Understanding the mechanisms that underpin the differences in responses to this pollutant class is of great importance for management recommendations. Summary Microplastics (MPs) (size < 5 mm) are increasingly recognized as anthropogenic contaminants that severely affect terrestrial ecosystems. These particles are always detected as a mixture of various polymer types and shapes. However, we have limited knowledge of the effect of combined MPs on plant–soil systems. To address this, we selected 10 types of MP, applied to three soil types singly and in combination along an increasing gradient of 1, 2, 5, 8, and 10 MP types at a content of 0.4% (w/v). After 8 weeks of pre‐incubation, winter wheat (TOBAK) was grown in each pot for another 8 weeks. Shoot and root biomass, soil aggregation, and carbon and nitrogen content were measured. The effects of the same MP on both soil and plant properties were drastically different (in size and effect direction) in the different soil types. However, no clear patterns were observed along an increasing number of microplastic types, suggesting that knowing the number of microplastic types in a sample, at equity of overall concentration, does not help predict effects. In contrast, our findings reveal the complex effects of multiple MPs on the soil–plant system and highlight that soil properties need to be taken into consideration when studying MP effects on terrestrial systems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper