0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

The missing link: A systematic review of microplastics and its neglected role in life-cycle assessment

The Science of The Total Environment 2024 18 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 70 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Tu Xayachak, Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Tu Xayachak, Nawshad Haque, Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Nawshad Haque, Nawshad Haque, Biplob Kumar Pramanik Nawshad Haque, Deborah Lau, Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Nawshad Haque, Deborah Lau, Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Nawshad Haque, Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Nawshad Haque, Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik Biplob Kumar Pramanik

Summary

This systematic review found that life-cycle assessments of plastic products almost never account for microplastic pollution. This means the true environmental and health impacts of plastics are being significantly underestimated in the tools used to guide policy decisions. The researchers call for better data on microplastic release and its effects so that the full cost of plastic products can be properly measured.

Study Type Review

The issue of plastic pollution has been exacerbated by the discovery of small plastic particles known as "microplastic". While the harmful effects of microplastics are becoming increasingly apparent, life-cycle assessment (LCA), as a holistic environmental assessment tool, has yet to offer a solution that can quantitatively capture the impacts associated with microplastics. In this paper, we conducted a systematic literature review to investigate how existing LCA studies quantify the environmental and human health effects of microplastics. A detailed analysis of 187 studies revealed that microplastics are rarely quantified, or even qualitatively discussed, in most LCAs. Thus, the true impacts of plastic products may be underrepresented and underestimated, leading to biased decision-making. We believe that this status quo is attributable to four fundamental issues, including (i) lack of microplastic leakage data; (ii) lack of quantitative cause-effect relationships between microplastic concentration and their impacts; (iii) exclusion of the "use" phase from the scope of analysis; and (iv) exclusion of long-term effects from landfilled plastic waste. These findings highlight the need for greater efforts and investment in microplastic research and data collection. To address the current knowledge gap, this article presents practical recommendations on how microplastics can be incorporated into the LCA framework, based on latest research.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper