0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Revealing the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of different particle size microplastics on diethyl phthalate (DEP) in rye (Secale cereale L.)

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xinyu Pan, Jinke Hu, Jinke Hu, Jinke Hu, Jinke Hu, Jinke Hu, Xinyu Pan, Jinke Hu, Jinke Hu, Jinke Hu, Jinke Hu, Jinke Hu, Jinke Hu, Ningning Xing Xinyu Pan, Jinke Hu, Xinyu Pan, Xinyu Pan, Xinyu Pan, Ningning Xing, Ningning Xing Guozhang Bao, Guozhang Bao, Guozhang Bao, Guozhang Bao, Guozhang Bao, Guozhang Bao, Xinyu Pan, Hui‐Xin Wang, Xinyu Pan, Jinke Hu, Hui‐Xin Wang, Jinke Hu, Jinke Hu, Ningning Xing Jinke Hu, Ningning Xing, Ningning Xing Ningning Xing Hui‐Xin Wang, Hui‐Xin Wang, Ningning Xing Ningning Xing, Ningning Xing, Ningning Xing

Summary

Researchers studied how microplastics of different sizes interact with a common plasticizer chemical (DEP) in rye plants. Smaller nanoplastics were able to enter and move through the plant, disrupting leaf cells, while the plasticizer chemical increased the plant's uptake of nanoplastics. This suggests that microplastics and the chemicals they carry can work together to contaminate food crops, with smaller particles posing the greatest risk.

Models

Understanding how widely distributed microplastics (MPs) and diethyl phthalate (DEP) interact with crops remains limited, despite their significant implications for human exposure. We used physiology, transcriptomics, adsorption kinetics, and computational chemistry to assess rye's molecular response to two sizes of MPs (200 nm and 5 µm) and DEP, both individually and in combination. Findings systematically highlight potential ecological risks from MPs and DEP, with ecotoxicity ranking as follows: CK (Control Check) < LMPs < SMPs < DEP < LMPs+DEP < SMPs+DEP. Fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy revealed SMP's translocation ability in rye and its potential to disrupt leaf cells. DEP increased the electronegativity on MPs, which enhanced their uptake by rye. DEP adsorption by MPs in hydroponics reduced DEP bioavailability in rye (18.17-46.91 %). Molecular docking studies showed DEP interacted with chlorophyll, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione S-transferases proteins' active sites. Transcriptomic analysis identified significant up-regulation of genes linked to mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, phytohormones, and antioxidant systems in rye exposed to MPs and DEP, correlating with physiological changes. These findings deepen the understanding of how MPs can accumulate and translocate within rye, and their adsorption to DEP raises crop safety issues of greater environmental risk.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper