0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Food & Water Sign in to save

Science Studies teachers’ selection of content when teaching for Sustainable Development

Nordic Studies in Science Education 2024 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sara Brommesson, Elisabeth Einarsson, Anders Jönsson

Summary

This paper is not about microplastics; it investigates how Swedish Science Studies teachers select content when teaching for Sustainable Development, finding that most teachers struggle to take a truly holistic approach that integrates social, economic, and environmental perspectives. The study is an education research paper with no relevance to microplastic science.

Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) advocates a holistic teaching approach, acknowledging social, economic, and environmental perspectives and their relations in striving for sustainable development (SD). It is through understanding these unique perspectives and their interrelations that solutions to SD problems, resolution of SD conflicts and ways to sustainability can be found. Holistic teaching can pose challenges for teachers when choosing what teaching content to include when teaching sustainability. Additionally, the literature does not clearly define what content is to be included within ESD. This study conducted focus group discussions to investigate what content 11 Science Studies teachers chose and whether their teaching approach was holistic when teaching for SD. The findings identified four themes of taught content. The participating teachers included different relationships between the environmental, societal, and economic dimensions of SD. However, the teachers had challenges with the relationships connected to the economic dimension of SD.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

What and why in teaching about sustainability

This paper is not about microplastics; it is a science education study examining how Swedish high school teachers select and justify content when teaching sustainable development, using a pedagogical content knowledge framework.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Sustainable Development Issues in Chemistry Learning as Educational for Sustainable Development Implementation: A Systematic Literature Review

This systematic literature review synthesized research on integrating sustainable development issues into chemistry education. While not directly about microplastics, it identified microplastic pollution as one of the sustainability topics being incorporated into chemistry curricula to help students understand real-world environmental challenges.

Article Tier 2

High School Sustainable and Green Chemistry: Historical–Epistemological and Pedagogical Considerations

Not relevant to microplastics — this is a chemistry education paper discussing how to better integrate sustainable and green chemistry into high school curricula, tracing the history of the Science, Technology, and Society movement and advocating for systems thinking approaches.

Article Tier 2

Integrating STEM Curriculum Across the Schools' Learning Environment to Reflect & Impact Life Practices

This paper is not about microplastics. It discusses integrating STEM curriculum across school environments to promote sustainability education and critical thinking, referencing UN Sustainable Development Goals. While it mentions environmental challenges broadly, the paper focuses on educational pedagogy rather than microplastic pollution or environmental contamination research.

Article Tier 2

Community-Engaged Research Projects in School Settings: Science Teachers’ Practices and Reflections

Not relevant to microplastics — this education research study analyzes how nine teachers implemented community-engaged research projects addressing environmental justice issues in their classrooms, focusing on pedagogy, student empowerment, and institutional challenges.

Share this paper