We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics in different nasal irrigation options
Summary
Researchers analyzed 150 samples of nasal irrigation products commonly used for sinusitis and rhinitis treatment to assess their microplastic content. They found an average of 6.49 microplastics per product, with nasal wash bottles containing the highest levels (up to 92 particles per product) while syringes had the lowest. The study highlights that nasal irrigation methods can be a direct route of microplastic exposure to the human respiratory tract.
PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the presence of microplastics in nasal irrigation methods commonly used in the treatment of sinusitis and rhinitis, and to evaluate human exposure. METHODS: A total of 150 samples were included in the study, consisting of nasal wash bottles containing nasal irrigation solution, seawater spray, syringes for nasal irrigation with isotonic solution. The amount of microplastics per millilitre in the samples and patient exposure during single use were assessed separately for each method and product. All samples were filtered using a stainless steel vacuum filter on filter paper with a pore size of 1.2 μm, washed at least three times with distilled water and incubated at 45 °C for 24 h to prevent mould growth. Identification and counting of microplastics was performed using a Leica Flexacam C1 camera connected to an M80 stereomicroscope. The presence of microplastics was confirmed by the hot needle method and Nile red staining. RESULTS: An average of 6.49 ± 13.08 microplastics/product was detected in all filtered samples. The lowest microplastic count was 0 microplastics/product in syringes and the highest was 92 microplastics/product in nasal wash bottles. Significant differences in the amount of microplastics individuals were exposed to during a single use were found between nasal wash bottles and seawater brands, while no significant differences were found between syringe brands. When nasal wash kits, seawater sprays and isotonic nasal rinses were evaluated separately, significant differences were found in the number of microplastics, the microplastics/ml ratio and the number of microplastics exposed during a single use. The highest microplastic exposure was found in nasal irrigation bottles. CONCLUSION: The exposure of individuals to microplastics increases with medical support treatments, regardless of intranasal or intravenous administration. Due to the inflammation, oxidative stress and proliferation caused by microplastics, new regulations and inspections of production conditions should be implemented worldwide to reduce exposure.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Identification and characterization of microplastics in nasal irrigation fluids: A preliminary study
This preliminary study found microplastics — primarily polypropylene from the nozzle of the irrigation device itself — in nasal rinse fluids used for sinus irrigation. The discovery raises questions about whether routine nasal irrigation could be inadvertently delivering plastic particles directly into the nasal passages and potentially deeper into the respiratory tract. The authors call for further research to understand the health significance of this previously unrecognized exposure route.
Measurement of Microplastic Release After the Use of Polypropylene Nasal Irrigation Bottles
Researchers detected microplastics in nasal irrigation fluids from polypropylene irrigation bottles after simulated use, with significantly higher microplastic counts in fluids from bottles representing 3 months of use compared to controls. The findings indicate that repeated mechanical stress on polypropylene nasal irrigation bottles releases microplastics directly into the nasal cavity during use.
Nasal lavage technique reveals regular inhalation exposure of microplastics, not associated from face mask use
Researchers used nasal lavage, a technique that rinses the nasal cavity, to measure microplastics that people inhale during normal daily activities. They found an average of about 28 microplastic particles per sample across all participants, with eight different polymer types detected. Notably, the study found no significant difference in microplastic levels between different types of face masks, suggesting that everyday environmental exposure is the primary source of inhaled microplastics rather than mask materials.
Identification and characterization of microplastics in human nasal samples
Researchers collected samples from human nasal cavities and confirmed the presence of microplastics, with polyethylene, polyester, acrylic, and polypropylene being the most common types. This finding adds the nose to the growing list of human body sites where microplastics have been detected, raising questions about potential health effects on the respiratory system.
Effect of Microplastic Inhalation on Allergic and Nonallergic Rhinitis
Researchers analyzed nasal lavage samples from rhinitis patients and healthy controls, finding significantly higher microplastic concentrations in both allergic and nonallergic rhinitis groups compared to controls. Younger participants and those with more severe symptoms tended to have higher microplastic levels in their nasal passages. The study suggests that inhaled microplastics may play a role in nasal inflammation, though more research is needed to establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship.