0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Terrestrial microplastics as emerging aquatic pollutants: A systematic review

Journal of Hazardous Materials Plastics 2026
Shiksha Singh, Minakshi Jain

Summary

This systematic review traces how microplastics from everyday land-based sources — laundry, tire wear, landfills, and farming — make their way into rivers and coastal waters. It highlights that what we do on land is the primary driver of microplastic pollution in the water we drink and the seafood we eat.

Polymers
Study Type Review

Microplastics (MPs), predominantly derived from terrestrial activities such as household effluents, tire wear, landfills, agricultural runoff, and e-waste, are now pervasive in freshwater and coastal environments. This review combines a systematic bibliometric search of Scopus records (2016–2025; initial search, n = 2,243) with a focused narrative synthesis of the 137 studies that met the inclusion criteria after eligibility screening. Quantitative evidence from these studies shows wide variation in environmental loads (e.g., 6,600–8,800 items·kg⁻¹ in landfill soils; 27–609 MPs·L⁻¹ in agricultural runoff) and strong sorption of co-contaminants (lead adsorption reported up to 2,810 mg·kg⁻¹, median values substantially lower depending on polymer and ageing). MPs have been detected in human tissues (blood, lung, placenta) and are associated in the literature with oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, and endocrine-disrupting pathways. Advances in FTIR/Raman spectroscopy and AI-assisted image analysis have improved detection, but heterogeneous sampling and analytical protocols limit cross-study comparability. Priority research needs identified from the 2016–2025 evidence base include: quantitative apportionment of under-reported sources (notably e-waste and informal recycling), mechanistic phytotoxicity and trophic-transfer studies under field conditions, and freshwater fate & transport modeling that incorporates dynamic land-use and sediment–water exchange. Standardized analytical frameworks, inter-laboratory calibration, and open data repositories are recommended to translate science into policy and targeted mitigation within the polymer environment health nexus.

Share this paper