0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Global change factors differ in effect when acting alone and in a multi-factor background

Nature Communications 2026 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Anika Lehmann, Matthias C. Rillig Anika Lehmann, Rebecca Rongstock, Rebecca Rongstock, Rebecca Rongstock, Rebecca Rongstock, Rebecca Rongstock, Rebecca Rongstock, Matthias C. Rillig Huiying Li, Huiying Li, Huiying Li, Anika Lehmann, Anika Lehmann, Anika Lehmann, Rebecca Rongstock, Matthias C. Rillig Anika Lehmann, Anja Wulf, Matthias C. Rillig Anja Wulf, Anja Wulf, Matthias C. Rillig Rebecca Rongstock, Anja Wulf, Matthias C. Rillig, Matthias C. Rillig Anika Lehmann, Anja Wulf, Anja Wulf, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Anja Wulf, Anja Wulf, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig

Summary

A subtractive experimental design in urban soils found that removing individual global change stressors — including microplastics — from a multi-factor background generally improved soil properties and biological processes, and that the combined effects of stressors often differed from what any single factor would predict alone. This is important for understanding microplastic impacts in real-world soils, where plastic pollution rarely occurs in isolation from other stressors like heat, drought, and chemical contamination.

The presence of multiple global change factors affects most ecosystems. Urban soils face stressors like heat, drought, road salt, nitrogen deposition, surfactants, and microplastics. Given that combined factors of global change have shown unpredictable effects, we here ask which individual factors have particularly negative effects in multifactorial contexts. We explore this through a subtractive design, comparing single-factor treatments (addition) to treatments where a specific factor is removed (subtraction). The results vary from predominantly negative, positive, to mixed effects. However, removing these factors from a multi-factor context generally improves soil properties and biological processes. Resource related factors enhance microbial activity individually but show no such benefit in multi-factor scenarios. Our findings highlight that the combined effects of factors often differ from their individual impacts. In restoration, priority should be given to mitigating factors with the strongest negative influence in multi-stressor contexts, rather than targeting those with significant isolated effects.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper