We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Decoding derogation: The impact of environmental values and political ideology on the effect of persuasive message about recycle and reuse behaviors
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined how environmental values and political ideology influence reactions to persuasive messages about plastic pollution, finding that these personal belief systems shape message derogation in distinct ways that subsequently affect risk perception, self-efficacy, and individuals' intentions to recycle and reuse plastics.
Although persuasive messages are designed to motivate individuals to engage in intended behaviors, they do not always work. Often, people follow previously established values and ideologies and dismiss persuasive messages. We examine how participants react to a persuasive message related to plastic pollution and how these reactions shape their willingness to recycle and reuse. Results indicate that environmental values and political ideology are associated with message derogation in distinct ways, which, in turn, affect risk perception, self-efficacy, and intention to recycle and reuse. Further, past behavior moderates the relationship between message derogation and perceived risk, but not the relationship between message derogation and self-efficacy. These results suggest that pre-existing values and ideologies play an important role in message derogation, a hitherto under-researched phenomenon that has key implications for self-reported behavioral change. Moreover, past behavior could serve as a powerful lever in steering risk perception and behavioral intent.
More Papers Like This
Communication Determinants of Environmental Behavior in the Context of Microplastics : An Examination of Cultural Cognition Types, Risk Perception, Psychological Distance, and Negative Emotions
AI summary Read the abstract
A survey of 1,000 Korean adults found that hierarchical cultural cognition influenced pro-environmental behavior toward microplastics through risk perception, psychological distance, and negative emotions, while individualist cognition operated only through negative emotions. These findings show that culturally tailored communication strategies — not one-size-fits-all messaging — are needed to translate public awareness of microplastic risks into actual behavior change.
The Effects of Message Framing on Response to Plastic Reduction Policies
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examined whether framing plastic pollution messaging in different ways — such as emphasising health risks versus environmental damage — affects public support for plastic reduction policies. Researchers found that message framing influences attitudes toward plastic pollution but the link to specific policy support was complex.
Are climate change perceptions related with plastic policy support? Effects of climate change skepticism, guilt, and efficacy on the acceptance of the plastic tax
AI summary Read the abstract
A structural model of 11 variables found that environmentalism, altruism, perceived risk, and personal efficacy positively predicted support for plastic taxation, while materialism and climate skepticism reduced willingness to pay. These findings suggest that framing plastic policy around personal health risk and environmental values — rather than climate change alone — may broaden public acceptance of regulatory measures.
Who worries about microplastics? The relative importance of personal values and individual risk judgements / ¿A quién le preocupan los microplásticos? La importancia relativa de los valores personales y los juicios individuales de riesgo
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers surveyed nearly 700 people in Norway to understand what drives public worry about microplastic pollution. They found that personal values and individual risk perceptions were the strongest predictors of concern, more so than demographic factors or general environmental attitudes. The study suggests that communication strategies about microplastic risks should account for how people personally evaluate threats rather than relying solely on scientific information.
Exploring the psychological antecedents of private and public sphere behaviours to reduce household plastic consumption
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers surveyed 648 people to understand what psychological factors drive different plastic-reduction behaviors — switching to plastic-free products, political activism, and supporting policy. Personal moral norms predicted all three types of action, while feeling personally capable was the strongest driver of purchase decisions, suggesting that reducing plastic use requires addressing both values and practical barriers.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.