0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

A review of methods for mitigating microplastic contamination in biosolids from wastewater treatment plants before agricultural soil application

The Science of The Total Environment 2024 13 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sadique Anyame Bawa, Sadique Anyame Bawa, Sadique Anyame Bawa, Sadique Anyame Bawa, Sadique Anyame Bawa, Anna Wrobel-Tobiszewska, Anna Wrobel-Tobiszewska, K. L. Andrew Chan, K. L. Andrew Chan, Anna Wrobel-Tobiszewska, Marcus Hardie, K. L. Andrew Chan, Carmel Towns, Marcus Hardie, Marcus Hardie, Carmel Towns Carmel Towns, Carmel Towns

Summary

This review examines methods for reducing microplastic contamination in biosolids from wastewater treatment plants before they are applied to agricultural soils. Researchers assessed physical, physicochemical, and biological approaches and found that each has inherent limitations, from inconsistent microbial degradation efficiency to filter design constraints. The study suggests that combining multiple methods at different intervention points within the treatment process offers the most promising path toward effective microplastic mitigation.

Study Type Environmental

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are recognized as major sources of microplastic (MP) particles in terrestrial environments, particularly in agricultural soils through biosolids application. While many reviews have focused on the distribution, detection, and mitigation of MPs in wastewater effluent to limit their discharge into oceans, our understanding of methods to mitigate biosolid contamination remains limited. This review focuses on methods for mitigating MPs contamination in biosolids at various intervention points, including sources, WWTP including the primary and secondary treatment stages where sludge is generated, and post-contamination. These methods are categorized as physical, physicochemical, and biological approaches, and their advantages and limitations are discussed. For instance, physicochemical methods, especially froth flotation, are cost-effective but are hindered by contaminants and reagents. Physical methods like microfibre filtration devices (MFD) are safe but their efficiency depends on the filter pore size and design. Biological methods, particularly microbial degradation, are limited by the varying efficiencies of microorganisms in breaking down MPs and the extended time required for their effective degradation. Other physical methods including dissolved air flotation, and ultrasonication already exist in WWTPs but may require retrofitting or optimization to enhance MP removal from biosolids. As each method inherently has limitations, the key to achieving MP-free biosolids, and thus preventing their release into agricultural soil, lies in integrating these methods through multi-coupling strategies.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper