0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Global soil microplastic assessment in different land-use systems is largely determined by the method of analysis: A meta-analysis

The Science of The Total Environment 2024 15 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Wulf Amelung Melanie Braun, Olivia Wrigley, Olivia Wrigley, Melanie Braun, Melanie Braun, Olivia Wrigley, Olivia Wrigley, Melanie Braun, Melanie Braun, Wulf Amelung Wulf Amelung Olivia Wrigley, Melanie Braun, Melanie Braun, Wulf Amelung Wulf Amelung Olivia Wrigley, Olivia Wrigley, Olivia Wrigley, Olivia Wrigley, Olivia Wrigley, Olivia Wrigley, Olivia Wrigley, Olivia Wrigley, Olivia Wrigley, Olivia Wrigley, Wulf Amelung Olivia Wrigley, Wulf Amelung Melanie Braun, Wulf Amelung Melanie Braun, Wulf Amelung Wulf Amelung Melanie Braun, Wulf Amelung Melanie Braun, Melanie Braun, Wulf Amelung Melanie Braun, Melanie Braun, Wulf Amelung Melanie Braun, Wulf Amelung Wulf Amelung Melanie Braun, Wulf Amelung Wulf Amelung

Summary

This meta-analysis pooled data from 89 studies to measure microplastic levels in soils across different land uses worldwide. A key finding is that reported microplastic concentrations vary wildly depending on the testing method used, making it hard to compare studies. This highlights that before we can truly understand how much microplastic is in the soil that grows our food, scientists need to agree on standardized measurement methods.

Study Type Review

Although microplastics (1 μm - 5 mm, MP) are increasingly recognised as a novel entity of pollutants, we still lack a basic understanding of their prevalence in different terrestrial environments. Here, we aimed at performing comparisons of MP concentrations (items kg<sup>-1</sup>) in different agro-ecosystems, with specific focus on input pathways and land uses, while accounting for the plethora of method variations available, such as analysed MP sizes, sampling depths, density separation solutions, as well as removal of organic matter. We found that the current global means of MP loads, from 89 studies (553 sites), benchmarks 2900 ± 7600 MP items kg<sup>-1</sup> soil, substantially more than the global median of 480 MP items kg<sup>-1</sup>. Roughly 81 % of the studies were conducted in Asia; hence, continent-wide comparisons are still hampered by low study numbers for most regions. Maximum MP numbers were found for soils under both greenhouses and plastic mulching (5200 ± 8300 items kg<sup>-1</sup>), followed by arable soils with sludge amendments (3700 ± 8800 items kg<sup>-1</sup>), surprisingly without evidence of elevated MP loads in horticultural fields relative to other agricultural management practices. Intriguingly, global MP loads significantly increased with decreasing levels of urbanisation, i.e., they were highest in rural areas. Yet, quantitative comparisons among sites are biased by the methodology selected for MP analyses. Apart from inconsistencies in sampling depth and size of screened MP particles, across all sites and treatments, largest MP loads were commonly found when using high-density solutions rather than low-density ones, and when soil organic matter removal was performed after, and not before, the density separation step.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper