0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Remediation Sign in to save

Losses and emissions in polypropylene recycling from household packaging waste

Waste Management 2024 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Luke A. Parker, Elena M. Höppener, Luke A. Parker, Alexander Matthew David Finnegan, Alexander Matthew David Finnegan, Johann B. Kasper, Alexander Matthew David Finnegan, Elena M. Höppener, Alexander Matthew David Finnegan, Luke A. Parker, Elena M. Höppener, Elena M. Höppener, Elena M. Höppener, Samuel Benjamin Rutten, Luke A. Parker, Samuel Benjamin Rutten, Samuel Benjamin Rutten, Luke A. Parker, Luke A. Parker, Sander Postema, Luke A. Parker, Elena M. Höppener, Sander Postema, Elena M. Höppener, Luke A. Parker, Luke A. Parker, Luke A. Parker, Elena M. Höppener, Elena M. Höppener, Elena M. Höppener, Elena M. Höppener, Luke A. Parker, Luke A. Parker, Marcel C. P. van Eijk Alexandra H. Leighton, Elena M. Höppener, Luke A. Parker, Alexandra H. Leighton, Luke A. Parker, Alexander Matthew David Finnegan, Samuel Benjamin Rutten, José Nijman, Luke A. Parker, Luke A. Parker, José Nijman, Amanda Larasati, Anderson S. Soares, Marcel C. P. van Eijk

Summary

Researchers replicated a typical post-consumer polypropylene recycling process and measured losses and emissions at every step for the first time. They found that approximately 3.9% of input material ended up as microplastics in wastewater, though dissolved air flotation removed 97-99% of those particles. The study identifies mechanical drying and wet grinding as the biggest loss points and suggests process improvements like keeping grinder knives sharp and lowering centrifugal speeds to reduce microplastic generation.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

In this study we replicated a typical high-quality post-consumer polypropylene (PP) recycling process to investigate its losses and emissions and study potential improvements. To our knowledge this is the first time that quantitative measurements on all process steps have been performed instead of an accumulated yield and emissions in water. In the process an overall PP yield of 85 wt% based on pure PP input is achieved. The loss of target material is largest at the two mechanical dryer steps (6.6 wt%) and in the wet grinder combined with friction washers (4.0 wt%). In the process we observed approx. 3.9 wt% of the PP input as microplastics in the wastewater before the dissolved air flotation unit which is capable of 97-99 % mass-based removal of microplastics (MPs). Around 330 µg of PP was emitted to air at the mechanical drying step for each kg of input material. This is a very low mass fraction, but considering the particle size distribution the number of particles is vast. This emission can be reduced by using air filters at locations where MPs are generated. To reduce losses and emissions we investigated a few potential process changes. Compared to current practice, positive results were achieved by ensuring that the knives of the wet grinder remain sharp. The mechanical drying process can be improved by lowering the centrifugal speed which reduces the generated microplastics here from 4 wt% to 1 wt% without significantly affecting the moisture content.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper