0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Joint aerobic biodegradation of synthetic and natural textile microfibers and laundry surfactants

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Francisco Ríos, Cristina Tapia-Navarro, Juan Francisco Martínez Gallegos, Manuela Lechuga, Mercedes Fernández‐Serrano

Summary

Researchers tested the biodegradation of cotton and polyester microfibers, alone and in combination with common laundry surfactants, to understand how these pollutants interact in aquatic environments. Cotton microfibers were partially biodegradable at about 75% mineralization, while polyester showed no biodegradation. Importantly, the presence of polyester microfibers inhibited surfactant breakdown, and certain combinations delayed cotton degradation, suggesting that real-world mixtures of textile microfibers and detergent chemicals may persist longer in the environment than expected.

Microfibers (MFs) represent one of the most prominent sources of microplastics in aquatic environments, primarily released during textile washing alongside surfactants found in laundry detergents. This study aimed to investigate the biodegradability of natural (cotton) and synthetic (polyester) MFs individually and in combination with two surfactants: sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS, anionic) and polyoxyethylene glycerol ester (PGE-OE6, nonionic). Using the OECD 301 F test, the research assessed biodegradation patterns and environmental interactions. Biodegradation profiles have been fitted to a pseudo first-order kinetic model and to a logistic kinetic model. Results showed that cotton MFs were partially biodegradable, achieving a 74.9 % mineralization, while polyester MFs exhibited no biodegradability. Importantly, when combined with surfactants, the biodegradation of SLS was inhibited by polyester MFs, but cotton MFs enhanced SLS mineralization. Conversely, the combination of cotton MFs with PGE-OE slowed the biodegradation of both the surfactant and the MFs, delaying the onset of cotton degradation. However, polyester MFs' biodegradability remained unaffected by either surfactant. These findings emphasize the need for more comprehensive assessments of how MFs and surfactants interact in real-world environmental matrices, as these interactions can influence their persistence and ecological impact. The study highlights the scientific importance of understanding pollutant interactions to develop more effective environmental monitoring and mitigation strategies.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Physiochemical Degradation of Plastic Fibers from Synthetic Fabrics and Effect of Natural Organic Matter in Aquatic Environments on Nanoplastics’ Behavior

Researchers studied how laundry conditions affect microfiber release from synthetic fabrics and how UV irradiation and pH alter fabric degradation, then examined how natural organic matter (NOM) influences nanoplastic behavior in water. They found that degradation conditions significantly changed fiber release rates and that NOM modified nanoplastic aggregation and stability.

Article Tier 2

Biodegradation of cotton-polyester textiles to understand fate of natural and synthetic microfibres in soil

Researchers buried cotton-polyester blended textiles in soil and monitored the differential biodegradation of natural versus synthetic microfibers over time. Cotton fibers degraded within months while polyester fibers persisted across the entire study period with minimal degradation, confirming that synthetic textile fibers accumulate in soil environments as persistent microplastic contaminants.

Article Tier 2

Aging of textile-based microfibers in both air and water environments

Researchers aged textile-based microfibers under controlled air and water environments over extended periods, characterizing changes in surface chemistry, mechanical properties, and morphology, finding that degradation pathways differed substantially between air and aquatic conditions.

Article Tier 2

Characterisation of microplastic fibres and their degradation under environmental conditions

This study investigated how UV radiation and mechanical stress degrade common synthetic microfibers including polyester, nylon, and acrylic, which represent the largest fraction of microplastic pollution in aquatic environments. Understanding how fibers degrade helps predict their persistence and how their physical properties change as they age in the environment.

Article Tier 2

Environmental Impact of Textile Materials: Challenges in Fiber–Dye Chemistry and Implication of Microbial Biodegradation

This review examines how the textile industry contributes to environmental pollution through both chemical dye waste and microplastic fiber release. Synthetic fabrics like polyester and nylon shed non-biodegradable microfibers during manufacturing and washing, while the dyeing process generates contaminated wastewater. The paper highlights microbial biodegradation as a promising and cost-effective approach to breaking down both textile waste and the microplastics it produces.

Share this paper