0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

The role of organisms’ size in microplastic pollution monitoring: Insights from Mytilaster lineatus and Amphibalanus improvisus

Marine Environmental Research 2024 18 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Majid Rasta Mohammad Mehdi Chiani, Majid Rasta Mohammad Mehdi Chiani, Majid Rasta Majid Rasta Majid Rasta Majid Rasta Majid Rasta Majid Rasta Majid Rasta Majid Rasta Majid Rasta Fatemeh Elmi, Majid Rasta Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Majid Rasta Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Majid Rasta Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Majid Rasta Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Fatemeh Elmi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Mojtaba S. Taleshi, Majid Rasta Majid Rasta Majid Rasta

Summary

Researchers compared two small filter-feeding organisms, the mussel Mytilaster lineatus and the barnacle Amphibalanus improvisus, as potential bioindicators of microplastic pollution in the Caspian Sea. Microplastics were found in all water, sediment, and organism samples, with barnacles accumulating higher concentrations per gram of body weight than mussels. Smaller organisms showed a stronger correlation with waterborne microplastic levels, suggesting that organism size matters when selecting species for pollution monitoring.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Marine organisms can serve as valuable bioindicators, providing insights into the spatial and temporal distribution of microplastics (MPs) in aquatic environments. While barnacles and mussels have shown promise as bioindicators of MP pollution in coastal environments, recent studies have questioned the efficacy of bivalves in this role. To address this, our research investigated the suitability of Mytilaster lineatus and Amphibalanus improvisus as biomonitors of MP pollution in the Caspian Sea through a comprehensive survey of these filter-feeding organisms. Sediment, seawater and organisms samples were collected from 9 stations during July to September 2022. MPs were detected in all compartments with an average of 0.57 ± 0.59 items/L for water, 72.66 ± 29.29 items/kg dry weight for sediment, 1.69 ± 0.79 items/individual or 7.96 ± 3.231 items/g wet weight (ww) for M. lineatus and 1.8 ± 0.9 items/individual or 35.18 ± 35.33 items/g ww for A. improvisus. MPs were prevailed by class 1000-3000 μm in size, black in color, fiber in shape and polyamide in polymer. The pollution load index (PLI) for seawater and sediment stations were 2.11 and 2.22, respectively, confirm low level risk of MP pollution at the sampling stations. There was a positive correlation between the MP abundance isolated from seawater and those extracted from the small species (p < 0.05). Bioconcentration factor (BCF) exhibited that both organisms absorbed and accumulated MPs from their surrounding water (BCF >1). A negative correlation was detected between the number of MPs extracted from organisms and their soft tissues (p < 0.01). Therefore, smaller individuals of M. lineatus and A. improvisus showed greater potential for biomonitoring. Our findings underscore the importance of species size in assessing MP pollution using biomonitors and recommend that future studies incorporate size-related variables for a more comprehensive understanding of MPs biomonitors.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper