0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Nitrogen metabolic responses of non-rhizosphere and rhizosphere microbial communities in constructed wetlands under nanoplastics disturbance

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024 35 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xinyue Zhao, Qinglin Li, Xiangwei Meng, Xiangwei Meng, Xinyue Zhao, Xiangwei Meng, Xiangwei Meng, Xiangwei Meng, Xiangwei Meng, Qinglin Li, Xinyue Zhao, Shih‐Hsin Ho Shih‐Hsin Ho Shih‐Hsin Ho Shih‐Hsin Ho Shih‐Hsin Ho Shih‐Hsin Ho Shih‐Hsin Ho Xinyue Zhao, Xinyue Zhao, Xinyue Zhao, Shih‐Hsin Ho

Summary

Researchers compared how microbial communities in plant root zones versus non-root zones of constructed wetlands respond to nanoplastic contamination. They found that nanoplastics reduced beneficial nitrogen-processing bacteria near roots by nearly 18%, while non-root microbes showed greater adaptability, even using nanoplastics as a carbon source. The findings suggest that constructed wetlands, which are important for water treatment, may have their nitrogen-removal capabilities impaired by nanoplastic pollution.

Constructed wetlands (CWs) serve as crucial sinks for nanoplastics, making them a significant research hotspot regarding the impacts of nanoplastics on the nitrogen metabolism within microbial communities. However, there has been a lack of comparative analysis between rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere microbial communities under nanoplastics disturbance. This study analyzes the nitrogen metabolic responses of these microbial communities in CWs following repeated nanoplastics disturbance. Results indicated that repeated nanoplastics disturbances led to a 17.72 % decrease in the relative abundance of nitrifying bacteria in rhizosphere microbial community, while the relative abundance of Polaromonas increased by 5.24 % in non-rhizosphere community. Microbial network revealed that rhizosphere microbial community primarily contributed to nitrogen metabolism by forming a tightly connected network. In contrast, non-rhizosphere microbes dominated nitrogen cycling by promoting energy and information exchange among microbes. Furthermore, rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere microbial communities exhibited distinct resistance and adaptation to nanoplastics disturbance. Rhizosphere microbes responded by activating antioxidant systems, whereas non-rhizosphere microbes could develop adaptive growth and metabolism, using nanoplastics as a carbon source. The adaptation strategies of non-rhizosphere community proved more advantageous for coping with persistent nanoplastics disturbance. This study comprehensively investigated the differences of nitrogen metabolism between rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere microorganisms in CWs under nanoplastics disturbance.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper