0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

A Critical Systematic Scoping Review on the Applications of Additive Manufacturing (AM) in the Marine Industry

Polymers 2024 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ayberk Sözen, Gökdeniz Neşer

Summary

Despite its classification in this database, this scoping review examines additive manufacturing (3D printing) applications in the marine industry — not microplastic research. It found that only 5% of AM publications relate to the marine sector, and classification societies have not yet adequately addressed AM standards for maritime use.

(1) Background: Additive manufacturing (AM), which has also become known as 3D printing, is rapidly expanding its areas of use in the marine industry. This study undertakes a historical development of AM in the marine industry. The study also criticises these developments to date and the future technological applications they will lead to, while considering the benefits for the industry and its segments. (2) Methods: This review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and was registered in the Open Science Framework. The personalized search strategy was applied to Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The core emphasis was placed on two eligibility criteria throughout the evaluation process. Firstly, Criteria 1 sought to determine the paper's relevance to AM. Secondly, Criteria 2 aimed to assess whether the paper delves into the implementation of AM or provides valuable insights into its utilisation within the marine industry. The risk of bias was analysed using a checklist of important parameters to be considered. (3) Results: In recent years, there has been a growing trend in studies related to the application of AM in the marine industry. While AM is widespread in industries such as automotive, aviation, and healthcare, it is relatively new for the marine industry. Almost only 5% of publications related to AM are related to the marine industry. There is a need for extensive research in many areas. It has been observed that classification societies and approval institutions, which largely drive the marine industry, have not yet taken AM into consideration sufficiently. (4) Conclusions: The studies show that AM is very promising for the marine industry. However, there are new studies at the experimental and theoretical level that need to be carried out to determine the right materials and AM methods to establish the quality control methodology and the necessary classification rules. This review also emphazises AM's pivotal role in reshaping the marine industry, addressing the potential environmental and occupational safety effects of AM.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Review Tier 2

Impact of Machine/Deep Learning on Additive Manufacturing: Publication Trends, Bibliometric Analysis, and Literature Review (2013-2022).

This bibliometric review analyzes a decade of publications on the intersection of machine and deep learning with additive manufacturing (3D printing). The study is focused on manufacturing technology trends and is unrelated to microplastic research.

Systematic Review Tier 1

A Systematic Literature Review of Maritime Transportation Safety Management

This systematic literature review of 186 articles found an increasing research trend in maritime transportation safety management, particularly in safety risk analysis and emergency management. The review identified four future research perspectives for developing more resilient maritime transportation systems, which is relevant to ocean pollution because shipping is a significant source of marine microplastic contamination.

Review Tier 2

Lost in definition: unravelling microplastics from marine coatings through bibliometrics science mapping in thematic analysis and systematic narrative literature review

Researchers conducted a bibliometric and narrative review to analyze why marine coatings—paints applied to ships—have been excluded from microplastic classification despite being recognized as a source of marine MPs. They identify the lack of a unified definition and classification system as the key barrier, and map how this knowledge gap has evolved in the literature.

Article Tier 2

Integrated User-Oriented Service for 3D Printing Environments with Recycled Material from Maritime Plastic Waste

Researchers developed a service platform for 3D printing using recycled plastic materials from marine plastic waste as feedstock, as part of the European CircularSeas project. Using marine plastic waste as a raw material for manufacturing could help reduce the amount of plastic degrading into microplastics in ocean environments.

Article Tier 2

A Study of marine plastic pollution abatement: A bibliometric analysis on status and development trend

Researchers conducted a bibliometric analysis of marine plastic pollution research using R software, finding that global scientific attention has grown substantially, with microplastics emerging as a central focus spanning both macro- and microscale investigations.

Share this paper