0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

The interaction between seagrass meadow density and microplastic retention in four cool-temperate estuaries

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2024 7 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Bianca J. Boshoff, Bianca J. Boshoff, Bianca J. Boshoff, Kelvin L. Hull, Kelvin L. Hull, Sophie von der Heyden Sophie von der Heyden Sophie von der Heyden

Summary

Researchers examined whether seagrass meadows trap microplastics in their sediments across four South African estuaries. They found that in three of the four estuaries, dense seagrass beds contained more microplastics than bare sediment, with fibers and fragments being the most common types caught. The study confirms that seagrasses can act as natural filters for microplastic pollution, though the potential effects of trapped plastics on seagrass health remain unknown.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics are widespread pollutants of estuarine ecosystems. Seagrasses have been hypothesized to filter microplastics through their dense meadows, yet the mechanisms governing their interaction with microplastics are not well understood, particularly within a South African context. Here we compared how microplastics might accumulate in the sediments associated with Zostera capensis meadows across dense and patchy meadows and unvegetated sediment. In addition, estuarine surface waters were sampled and analysed. The number of microplastics ranged between 23.5 ± 24.9 and 30.1 ± 22.1 microplastics per Kg sediment, with up to 70 % identified as fibres. In three of the four estuaries, a greater abundance of microplastics were found in areas of dense seagrass coverage compared to bare sediment, with fibres and fragments found to be the dominant microplastic. Estuarine surface waters revealed microplastic concentrations ranging from 1.7 ± 1.6 to 2.5 ± 1.4 MPs per m<sup>3</sup>, with 88 % of samples containing microplastics. This study confirms the trapping ability of Z. capensis meadows for microplastics and highlights paucity of regional knowledge into the effects that microplastics may have on seagrass health and persistence.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper