0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

D6.7 Summary of outcome of qualitative Life cycle screening assessments of selected technologies

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lysenko, Olga, Safarianbana, Sahar, Hasselberg, Pavinee, Elginoz Kanat, Nilay, Mata, Erika, Subramanian, Vrishali, Schellenberger, Steffen

Summary

Researchers conducted qualitative life cycle sustainability screening assessments of selected low-TRL textile technologies under the BioSusTex project, evaluating their environmental, economic, and social impacts to guide early design decisions and prioritize further development.

This report presents the summary of main results of a qualitative sustainability screening conducted under Task 6.1 of the BioSusTex project. The objective was to assess selected low-TRL (Technology Readiness Level) textile technologies in their early innovation stages, focusing on environmental, economic, and social impact across their life cycles. The assessment aims to guide design decisions, prioritize promising options for further development, and align innovations with Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) principles. Two methodological approaches were used: the Life Cycle Based Risk and Opportunity Mapping (LCBROM) method and the SSbD Scoping Method. LCBROM, applied to technologies in WP1, WP2, and WP4 of BioSusTex, identifies potential sustainability trade-offs through stakeholder engagement and life cycle thinking. The SSbD Scoping Method, applied in WP3 of BioSusTex, supports structured evaluations of safety and sustainability assumptions.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design

This systematic review of life cycle assessments for the textile industry identified key environmental impact hotspots across the supply chain, finding that fiber production and dyeing processes dominate environmental burdens and that eco-design strategies offer the greatest improvement potential.

Article Tier 2

Analysis of Socio-economic, Technological, Environmental Characteristics of the Life Cycle of Textile Products

This review analyzes the socio-economic, technological, and environmental characteristics across the full life cycle of textile products and their impacts on human health and natural resources. The analysis found that 45% of textiles can be reused and 30% processed into technical textiles, and that extending service life by nine months can reduce energy, water, and CO2 emissions by up to 30%.

Article Tier 2

Empowering Eco-Friendly Choices: An Environmental Impact Assessment Decision Support System for Textiles and Clothing

Researchers developed a decision support system for the textile and clothing industry to help producers calculate the environmental impact of their production processes. The tool covers key lifecycle stages and was designed to help both producers and consumers make more environmentally conscious decisions in a demanding sustainability market.

Article Tier 2

Life Cycle Based Comparison of Textile Ecolabels

This life cycle analysis compared multiple textile ecolabels for their coverage of key environmental impact categories including microplastic fiber release, finding significant gaps in how current labels address the full environmental footprint of textile production.

Article Tier 2

Combining Flexible and Sustainable Design Principles for Evaluating Designs: Textile Recycling Application

Researchers developed a framework combining flexible and sustainable design principles to evaluate textile recycling technologies. The study addresses the growing environmental burden of textile waste in the U.S., where over 15 million tons are discarded annually with less than 15% recycled, contributing to microplastic pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. The proposed evaluation method aims to help identify recycling approaches that are both economically viable and environmentally responsible.

Share this paper