0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Kaksoisolennaisuus arvioinnin toteuttaminen yritykselle : kestävyyden integrointi yrityksen päätöksentekoon

LUTPub (LUT University) 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Törrönen, Ada

Summary

Researchers investigated how companies can implement double materiality assessments as required by the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), examining how to integrate sustainability considerations into corporate decision-making frameworks.

Growing ecological and societal pressures have driven the advancement of corporate responsibility regulation. The European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and its core principle of double materiality require increasingly comprehensive assessments of both the impacts of business operations on the environment and society, as well as the effects of these issues on companies’ business activities. In this master's thesis, a double materiality assessment was conducted as a case study for the commissioning company. A multi-method approach was applied, combining qualitative and quantitative methods. The aim of the study was to produce practical insights to support the company’s strategic decision-making, sustainability efforts, and preparation for sustainability reporting. The empirical data consisted of scientific and industry-specific sources, risk analysis tools, and the company’s internal data. Data collection was based on interviews with internal stakeholders and a survey targeted at external stakeholders. The material was analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively, and the assessment process was carried out in line with the requirements of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). The study identified the company’s key impacts, risks, and opportunities. Environmental themes included climate change, microplastic pollution, resource use, biodiversity loss, and the opportunity of circular economy solutions. Social aspects focused on ethical working conditions and wages in the supply chain, while governance highlighted supply chain monitoring and geopolitical risks. Based on their significance, the company’s material topics were defined. The study showed that double materiality assessment effectively supports sustainable business by identifying material impacts, improving transparency, and strengthening stakeholder trust.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

CSRD, reporting and beyond: challenges and opportunities for financial institutions

This article reviews the challenges and opportunities the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) presents for banks and financial institutions in managing ESG disclosure requirements. It argues that while compliance is demanding, the directive enables better integration of environmental and social risks into investment and lending decisions.

Article Tier 2

Corporate Social Responsibility Practices Amid Political and Economic Transformation in Europe

Not relevant to microplastics — this paper analyses corporate social responsibility practices and greenwashing among European companies in the context of post-pandemic political and economic change.

Article Tier 2

Duurzaam betere jaarverslaggeving

This paper examines sustainability reporting practices in annual reports, analysing how organisations communicate environmental and social performance to stakeholders. The study evaluates current standards and frameworks for sustainable corporate reporting and identifies areas for improvement in transparency and comparability.

Article Tier 2

Sustainability reporting as a 21st century problem statement: using a quality lens to understand and analyse the challenges

This study argues that corporate sustainability reporting lacks rigour and comparability, proposing that quality science and quality management principles could provide a robust framework for standardising how organisations measure and communicate their environmental and social performance.

Article Tier 2

La sostenibilità come paradigma: il caso dell’infrastruttura Metrofood-RI nel settore agroalimentare

This Italian paper examines sustainability as a guiding framework for agri-food research infrastructure, discussing how modern food systems must incorporate environmental criteria. The work provides context for how sustainable food production practices can reduce plastic use and environmental contamination.

Share this paper