0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Data file

Figshare 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Rebecca Rongstock Rebecca Rongstock Rebecca Rongstock Rebecca Rongstock Rebecca Rongstock Rebecca Rongstock Rebecca Rongstock Rebecca Rongstock

Summary

Researchers investigated how multiple global change stressors — including microplastics, salinity, heat, drought, and surfactants — interact in urban soils using a subtractive experimental design, finding that combined effects frequently differ from individual impacts and that mitigating the strongest multi-stressor factors is more effective for restoration than targeting those with significant isolated effects.

The presence of multiple global change factors affects most ecosystems, especially urban soils, which face stressors like heat, drought, road salt, nitrogen deposition, surfactants, microplastics, and heavy metals. These factors are often studied in isolation or in pairs, leaving their combined effects poorly understood. Importantly, understanding how removing a single factor impacts an ecosystem amidst multiple stressors is crucial for effective restoration.We explored this through a subtractive design, comparing single-factor treatments (addition) to treatments where a specific factor was removed (subtraction). The results varied: salinity had predominantly negative effects, warming had positive effects, and drought had mixed effects as single factors. However, removing these factors from a multi-factor context generally improved soil properties and biological processes. Microplastics and surfactants enhanced microbial activity individually but showed no such benefit in multi-factor scenarios.Our findings highlight that the combined effects of factors often differ from their individual impacts. In restoration, priority should be given to mitigating factors with the strongest negative influence in multi-stressor contexts, rather than targeting those with significant isolated effects. This approach can better address the complexities of global change in ecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper