0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Prioritization of Emerging Pollutants Used for Fingerprinting Specific Water Sources

Advances in water security 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 53 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Olutobi Daniel Ogunbiyi, Luciana Teresa Dias Cappelini, Olutobi Daniel Ogunbiyi, Maria Guerra de Navarro, Maria Guerra de Navarro, Carolina Cuchimaque Lugo, Carolina Cuchimaque Lugo, C. W. Heath, Natalia Quinete C. W. Heath, Joshua Ocheje, Carolina Cuchimaque Lugo, Carolina Cuchimaque Lugo, Luciana Teresa Dias Cappelini, Natalia Quinete Natalia Quinete

Summary

Researchers investigated emerging pollutants, including microplastics, as fingerprinting tools for identifying specific water contamination sources. The study prioritized various synthetic organic compounds based on their potential for bioaccumulation and toxicological effects, aiming to improve monitoring and regulatory frameworks for water quality management.

Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

Emerging Pollutants (EPs) are synthetic organic compounds identified in the environment that may potentially threaten ecological systems and human health. They can enter water systems from a variety of sources and are of particular concern due to their potential for bioaccumulation and toxicological effects. Their origin and environmental impact are not yet fully understood, so the monitoring of these compounds by regulatory bodies is not yet completely established. EPs cover a broad spectrum of substances, including pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors, pesticides, and microplastics, that are not always detected by traditional monitoring targeted analysis. Non-targeted analysis (NTA) or suspect screening (SS) employing high-resolution mass spectrometry has emerged as a promising tool for environmental monitoring to identify and prioritize a broader spectrum of emerging contaminants that are not routinely monitored and their transformation products. Here we present a comprehensive review of NTA strategies for screening EPs, covering major insights on the current methodologies and limitations, workflows used for NTA and considerations during sampling, sample preparation, instrumental data acquisition, analysis, and approaches for identification and prioritization of EP in water sources. We have ultimately prioritized predominant and toxic compounds in groundwater, drinking water, surface water, wastewater, and leachates.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper