We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Trend analysis of sustainability claims in meat and dairy product launches (2004–2023): a case study of the UK, the USA, and China
Summary
Despite its title referencing sustainability and meat and dairy products, this paper studies trends in sustainability marketing claims on food product labels across the UK, USA, and China from 2004 to 2023 — not microplastic pollution. It examines which types of "green" claims have grown fastest in food product launches, and is not relevant to microplastics or human health.
Abstract The sustainability of pastoral farming must rapidly improve to protect land, water, and climate. However, producers of meat and dairy products also need economically viable pathways for this transition. One approach is accessing markets that prioritise sustainability attributes. This study investigated trends in new meat and dairy products launched with sustainability claims in the USA, China, and the UK from 2004 to 2023. Using data from the Mintel Global New Product Database and trend regression analysis, the number, share, and location quotient (LQ) of such product launches were determined. Results showed significant growth in sustainability claims across all markets, with the UK experiencing faster growth for meat products, while the USA and China showed faster growth for dairy products. In both categories, the strongest growth was observed for claims related to Environmentally Friendly Packaging and Recyclable materials. For dairy products, Sustainable (Habitat/Resources) claims followed, while meat products showed growth in Animal Welfare claims. Differences across markets suggest producers should adopt a targeted, market-specific approach to capitalise on trends in sustainability-focused meat and dairy products.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Sustainability Schemes in the Cosmetic Industry: Scope, Credibility, and Value Chain Coverage
Despite its title referencing sustainability schemes in cosmetics, this paper studies the credibility and coverage of 24 eco-certification labels used in the cosmetics industry — not microplastic pollution. It examines gaps in lifecycle coverage and greenwashing risks within certification schemes and is not relevant to microplastics or human health.
Sustainable Marketing and the Challenges of Green Marketing Communication: Survey of Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behaviour for Sustainable Products in the Czech Republic
Not relevant to microplastics — this survey examines Czech consumer attitudes toward sustainable products, exploring the gap between professed environmental values and actual purchasing behavior, and the challenges of green marketing communication.
Sustainability Challenges in the Fashion Industry: Managing Waste and Ethical Labor Practices
Despite its title referencing microplastics, this paper studies sustainability challenges in the fast fashion industry — not microplastic pollution specifically. It examines consumer behavior, ethical labor practices, textile waste management, and greenwashing, with no substantive focus on microplastic fiber emissions or health impacts. It is not directly relevant to microplastic science.
Stability in the heart of chaos; (Un)sustainable refrains in the language of climate crisis
This conceptual paper examines how the word "sustainability" has become overused in environmental education and marketing, potentially creating a false sense of progress while harmful practices continue. While not directly about microplastics, the critique is relevant because many plastic products are marketed as "sustainable" without addressing the microplastic pollution they generate. The paper calls for more radical approaches to environmental education rather than relying on sustainability as a feel-good label.
Contributions aux enjeux des transitions dans les domaines des produits et matériaux durables
This paper is not primarily about microplastics. It is a broad research summary covering sustainable food systems, life cycle assessment methodologies, alternative proteins, and biodegradable food packaging materials. While it briefly mentions including microplastics in life cycle assessment methods, the focus is on food system sustainability and antimicrobial packaging rather than microplastic contamination or health effects.