0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Human health evidence in the global treaty to end plastic pollution: a survey of policy perspectives

Cambridge Prisms Plastics 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Trisia Farrelly, Marie‐France Dignac, Xavier Cousin Marie‐France Dignac, Joe Yates, Trisia Farrelly, Megan Deeney, Megan Deeney, Megan Deeney, Megan Deeney, Trisia Farrelly, Joe Yates, Trisia Farrelly, Trisia Farrelly, Marie‐France Dignac, Marie‐France Dignac, Marie‐France Dignac, Megan Deeney, Rosemary Green, Xavier Cousin Marie‐France Dignac, Marie‐France Dignac, Joe Yates, Suneetha Kadiyala, Xavier Cousin Trisia Farrelly, Trisia Farrelly, Mengjiao Wang, Trisia Farrelly, Megan Deeney, Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Marie‐France Dignac, Xavier Cousin Marie‐France Dignac, Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin, Trisia Farrelly, Megan Deeney, Rosemary Green, Marie‐France Dignac, Marie‐France Dignac, Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Marie‐France Dignac, Suneetha Kadiyala, Rosemary Green, Xavier Cousin, Marie‐France Dignac, Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Marie‐France Dignac, Xavier Cousin Megan Deeney, Joe Yates, Suneetha Kadiyala, Mengjiao Wang, Xavier Cousin, Xavier Cousin, Xavier Cousin, Suneetha Kadiyala, Xavier Cousin Trisia Farrelly, Marie‐France Dignac, Rosemary Green, Rosemary Green, Xavier Cousin Rosemary Green, Rosemary Green, Marie‐France Dignac, Rosemary Green, Xavier Cousin Rosemary Green, Rosemary Green, Rosemary Green, Rosemary Green, Xavier Cousin Marie‐France Dignac, Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin, Xavier Cousin Joe Yates, Marie‐France Dignac, Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Trisia Farrelly, Mengjiao Wang, Trisia Farrelly, Trisia Farrelly, Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin Xavier Cousin

Summary

Researchers surveyed United Nations delegates involved in developing the Global Plastics Treaty to understand how human health evidence is being considered in policy decisions. They found that most delegates support health-based measures and see scientific evidence as essential, but face challenges translating research into actionable policy. The study underscores the importance of making health research accessible and relevant to policymakers working on international plastic pollution agreements.

Abstract Science shows mounting global health risks associated with plastics life cycle pollution. Leveraging evidence and streamlining research to inform policy is critical to safeguarding people and planet. We conducted an electronic survey questionnaire, between 16th April and 16th August 2024, amongst United Nations government delegates developing the Global Plastics Treaty. We explored (1) perceptions and prioritisation of human health evidence, (2) preferred plastic pollution mitigation strategies, and (3) priorities for health research. Responses were collected in Qualtrics and analysed using summary statistics, the Fisher’s Exact Test, and thematically mapped to the Policy Cycle Framework. We received 27 survey responses, balanced by gender and career stage, including 23 countries and all World Bank country income classifications and regions, but greater representation from high-income and European countries. Human health was the highest-ranking concern related to plastics risks (Sum of rank scores (SRS) = 54). Most delegates expressed strong conviction in evidence of risks associated with plastics chemicals, polymers, products, microplastics and broader life cycle emissions. Reducing plastics production (SRS = 53) and eliminating chemicals, polymers and products of concern (SRS = 53) were prioritised, even amongst those affiliated with waste management departments or less convinced of health risks. We found the least regard for recycling as a strategy to protect health (SRS = 4–5) and eliminating open burning was the most prioritised downstream measure (SRS = 15). Generating quantitative, causal data on risks across plastics life cycles, identifying emerging health hazards, defining criteria, safe lists and substitutes for chemicals, polymers and products were government delegate priorities for research, alongside tools to track policy impacts on health and greater bilateral communication between scientists and delegations. Health risks of all forms of plastic pollution were a concern for most delegates responding to our survey. We identified key priorities for policy-driven research to strengthen the science-policy interface and support evidence-based plastics policy that protects human health.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper