0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Estimating the accumulation and re-accumulation of commercial tobacco, electronic cigarette, and cannabis waste based on a stratified random sample of census blocks

PLoS ONE 2025 3 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

A stratified random survey of 60 census blocks across San Diego County's largest cities quantified tobacco, electronic cigarette, and cannabis (TEC) waste in public spaces, mapping demographic and geographic patterns to inform pollution reduction policies for these ubiquitous forms of litter.

We investigated the amount and distribution of waste generated by commercial tobacco, electronic cigarette, and cannabis (TEC) use to inform policy options aimed at mitigating the environmental harm caused by these products. Using disproportionate stratified random sampling, we selected 60 census blocks from the eight largest cities in San Diego County, California. We twice surveyed publicly accessible areas in these blocks to quantify TEC waste accumulation and its re-accumulation. All collected items were photographed, classified, geocoded, counted, and properly discarded. We identified demographic, land use, and behavioral data from public sources and direct observations. We modeled total cigarette butt quantities for all census blocks across the eight cities and found similar results for Round 1 (8.63 million) and Round 2 (8.66 million) collections. Single-use plastic cigarette filters were the primary contributor to TEC waste (94%). Total TEC waste counts and cigarette butt counts showed strong linear associations (r = +0.86 and r = +0.91). The area surveyed, land use category, resident demographics, smoking prevalence, and walkability explained 78% of the variance in cigarette butt count. The interval between Round 1 and 2 counts did not affect re-accumulation counts, suggesting that baseline TEC waste levels were re-established within 1-2 months after cleanup. Annually, we estimate up to 200 million cellulose acetate plastic filters may be discarded in public areas of the eight cities. Given the continuous deposition, vast quantity, heterogeneous distribution, and rapid re-accumulation of TEC waste after cleanup, increasing removal efforts alone are financially untenable and impractical downstream solutions for TEC waste. Community-wide policies (e.g., filter bans, outdoor smoking restrictions) and individual behavior changes (e.g., reduced smoking rates, proper disposal of cigarette butts) are necessary to effectively mitigate the environmental impact of TEC waste in urban settings.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Spatio-temporal distribution of cigarette butt contamination in urban beaches with varying levels of use.

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers assessed cigarette butt contamination on two urban beaches in Recife, Brazil over nine months, finding that contamination levels correlated with beach use intensity, with butts at varying degradation stages, and that brand composition varied temporally and spatially across sampling events.

Article

Understanding the factors affecting the quantity and composition of street litter: Implication for management practices

AI summary Read the abstract

This study surveyed litter on sidewalks across 35 sites in the New Jersey Lower Passaic River watershed, finding cigarette butts and plastic items most prevalent, with litter abundance linked to property value, outdoor smoking areas, and proximity to schools. The findings suggest targeted waste bin placement and plastic bag bans as practical management interventions to reduce urban litter reaching waterways.

Article Tier 2

Littered cigarette butts in both coastal and inland cities of China: occurrence and environmental risk assessment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers surveyed cigarette butt pollution across four Chinese cities, both coastal and inland, assessing contamination levels and heavy metal leaching risks. The study found that cigarette butts release microplastics and heavy metal particles, with contamination patterns varying by land use type and city development level, highlighting cigarette waste as an underappreciated source of microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Assessing the relationship between urbanization and plastic litter on sandy beaches in California, USA

AI summary Read the abstract

A survey of 23 beaches along the California coast found that plastic litter abundance increased significantly with urbanization, as measured by surrounding population density.

Article Tier 2

An interdisciplinary approach to understanding cigarette butt littering: spatial distribution, ecological impacts, and human perceptions

AI summary Read the abstract

Cigarette butts are one of the most common—and most overlooked—forms of litter, and this study shows they're more harmful than most people realize: chemicals leaching from discarded butts poisoned and killed water snails and sea snails in lab tests, and butts also shed tiny plastic fibers (microplastics) as they break down. Surveys found most people think of cigarette litter as a "gross" health issue rather than a plastic pollution problem, meaning the environmental risks—and the microplastics we may be exposed to through contaminated water and seafood—are flying under the radar. The takeaway: proper disposal of cigarette but

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper