0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Remediation Sign in to save

Polyurethane microplastics and associated tris(chloropropyl)phosphate additives both affect development in larval fathead minnow Pimephales promelas

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2025 3 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied how polyurethane microplastics and their flame retardant additive, tris(chloropropyl)phosphate, affect the development of fathead minnow fish larvae. They found that both the microplastic particles and the chemical additive independently caused developmental abnormalities. The study highlights that the toxicity of microplastics extends beyond physical effects to include the harmful chemicals they carry, particularly for understudied polymer types like polyurethane.

Polymers

Microplastics (< 5 mm) are a diverse class of contaminants ranging in morphology, polymer type, and chemical cocktail. Microplastic toxicity can be driven by one or a combination of these characteristics. Most studies, however, evaluate the physical effect of the most commercially available polymers. By disregarding other polymers with high consumption and/or production rates, and the chemical constituents of plastics, we fail to have a holistic understanding of the mechanisms of toxicity. Polyurethane is understudied in terms of effects testing yet considered one of the most hazardous polymers due to its chemical composition. Polyurethane is a high production polymer and is found in common consumer products ranging from packaging to spray foam insulation. To better understand the physico-chemical effects of polyurethane and a common additive in polyurethane products, we exposed larval fathead minnows for 28 days to polyurethane without chemical additives (i.e., plastic treatment), chemical leachate from polyurethane containing chemical additives (i.e., tris(chloropropyl)phosphate [TCPP]; i.e., chemical treatment) and polyurethane with chemical additives (i.e., plastic with chemical treatment) in a fully factorial experiment. We observed significant decreases in growth at 12 days posthatch (dph) in the plastic, chemical, and plastic with chemical treatments, suggesting a physical and chemical driver of toxicity. At 28 dph, we did not observe significant differences in growth, suggesting individuals can recover. We also observed concentrations of ΣTCPPs in fathead minnow exposed to the plastic with chemical treatment and the chemical only treatment, demonstrating TCPP uptake in exposed individuals. Combined, our data suggests the importance of both the physical and chemical components of microplastics when assessing effects, and thus emphasizing the need to evaluate the effects of microplastics in a multidimensional way.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Understanding the contribution of plastic additive in microplastic toxicity from consumer products using fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed fathead minnows to polyethylene microplastics with and without chemical additives for 60 days to determine whether the plastic particles or their added chemicals drive toxic effects. While fish readily ingested the plastics, no significant differences in growth, survival, or body condition were observed between treatment groups. However, gene expression analysis revealed subtle biological changes, suggesting that longer-term or higher-dose studies may be needed to fully understand microplastic toxicity.

Article Tier 2

No evidence of microplastic impacts on consumption or growth of larval Pimephales promelas

AI summary Read the abstract

This study found no evidence that microplastic polyethylene microspheres affected the feeding or growth of larval fathead minnows at the concentrations tested. The results suggest that not all microplastic exposures produce measurable harm in fish larvae, and that effect magnitude may depend strongly on particle concentration and type.

Article Tier 2

Enhanced toxicity of triphenyl phosphate to zebrafish in the presence of micro- and nano-plastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Co-exposure of zebrafish to triphenyl phosphate (TPhP) with micro- or nano-polystyrene showed that nano-PS (46 nm) aggravated TPhP-induced liver and gonad enlargement, while micro-PS had minimal effect — suggesting nanoplastics can enhance the toxicity of organophosphate flame retardants.

Article Tier 2

Plastics and Fish Don't Mix: Potential Effects of Microplastics on Juvenile Fathead Minnows

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied how microplastic beads accumulate in the digestive tracts of juvenile fathead minnows after 1-day and 10-day exposures, finding that plastic particles are retained in the gut, which may reduce growth and increase mortality in this widely-used freshwater indicator species during critical early development.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics and plastic additives as contaminants of emerging concern: A multi-biomarker approach using Rhinella arenarum tadpoles

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed toad tadpoles to polyethylene microplastics and the flame retardant TBBPA, both alone and in combination, for 30 days. They found that the mixture produced different toxic effects than either substance alone, affecting growth, enzyme activity, and cellular stress markers. The study highlights the importance of studying microplastics alongside common plastic additives, since their combined effects may differ from individual exposures.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper