0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Actionable avenues for dermatologists to reduce their environmental impact

Dermatology Online Journal 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 53 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Genevieve S. Silva, Jeromy W. Gotschall, Misha Rosenbach

Summary

This commentary outlines actionable steps dermatologists can take to reduce the environmental impact of healthcare delivery, including minimizing single-use plastics, reducing regulated medical waste, and implementing green procurement policies. Researchers highlighted opportunities for reassessing procedure kits, minimizing medication waste, and promoting environmentally conscious practices. The study underscores that healthcare settings are significant contributors to plastic waste and offers practical strategies for reducing that footprint.

Models

Climate change poses an increasing threat to human health, with well-documented impacts on dermatologic conditions. However, the U.S. healthcare sector is paradoxically a significant contributor to climate change-worsening greenhouse gas emissions. To address this negative externality, calls to action to decarbonize healthcare delivery have spurred research and initiatives around improving the environmental sustainability of medicine. Published sustainability recommendations for dermatologic practices have addressed themes such as renewable energy, single-use disposable materials, regulated medical waste, and clinician advocacy. Our current commentary provides an analysis of the potential of existing recommendations and outlines additional, novel, and actionable interventions. We highlight recently released decarbonization resources and regulatory changes. We emphasize the importance of reassessing procedure kits, minimizing medication waste, and implementing green procurement policies. We also address nuances in promoting environmentally-conscious transit, maximizing the efficient use of technology, supporting alternatives to single-use items, leveraging resources for patient education, assessing appropriate use of carbon credits, and bolstering community climate resilience.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Plastics in dermatology: A review and solutions

This review examines the widespread use of plastics in dermatology products and medical devices, highlighting health risks at every stage of the plastic life cycle. The authors note that microplastics and their chemical additives can be absorbed through the skin and recommend that dermatologists reduce plastic use and advocate for safer alternatives to protect both patient and environmental health.

Article Tier 2

Mikroplastik und dermatologische Versorgung

This brief commentary highlighted the relevance of microplastic pollution to dermatological care, noting that plastics are ubiquitous in medical settings and arguing that physicians have a professional responsibility to promote more sustainable practices. The precautionary principle was invoked to justify action ahead of complete evidence on health impacts.

Article Tier 2

Towards greener conferences: Addressing the sustainability of cosmeceutical samples

This commentary addresses the environmental impact of distributing large quantities of cosmeceutical samples at dermatology conferences like the annual EADV Congress. The authors highlight that single-use plastic packaging from these samples contributes to waste and microplastic pollution. The piece proposes practical solutions including sustainable packaging policies, digital sampling alternatives, and making sustainability a key conference agenda item.

Article Tier 2

Green surgery: to reduce carbon footprint

This paper examines the environmental footprint of surgical procedures and proposes strategies for green surgery, including reduction of single-use plastic instruments and packaging that contribute to operating theater waste streams. The authors call for systemic changes in hospital procurement to reduce carbon emissions from healthcare.

Article Tier 2

Cobénéfices santé-environnement : concepts et recommandations pour la pratique clinique

This paper reviews the concepts of health-environment co-benefits within One Health, EcoHealth, and Planetary Health frameworks, providing clinical practice recommendations for healthcare professionals to integrate environmental co-benefit considerations — including reductions in plastic and chemical exposures — into patient counseling and healthcare system decision-making.

Share this paper