Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Influence of mesh selectivity on risk assessment of marine microplastics

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2025 7 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 53 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.

Zijiang Yang, Zijiang Yang, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Zijiang Yang, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Jiaqi Zhang, Jiaqi Zhang, Jiaqi Zhang, Jiaqi Zhang, Atsuhiko Isobe, Hisayuki Arakawa, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Zijiang Yang, Voranop Viyakarn Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Jiaqi Zhang, Jiaqi Zhang, Jiaqi Zhang, Jiaqi Zhang, Jiaqi Zhang, Hisayuki Arakawa, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Voranop Viyakarn Voranop Viyakarn Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Voranop Viyakarn Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Voranop Viyakarn Hisayuki Arakawa, Masahiko Sakaguchi, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Jiaqi Zhang, Jiaqi Zhang, Masahiko Sakaguchi, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Atsuhiko Isobe, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Voranop Viyakarn Shiro Oka, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Hisayuki Arakawa, Atsuhiko Isobe, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Hisayuki Arakawa, Atsuhiko Isobe, Hisayuki Arakawa, Voranop Viyakarn Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Voranop Viyakarn Voranop Viyakarn Voranop Viyakarn Hisayuki Arakawa, Voranop Viyakarn Atsuhiko Isobe, Hisayuki Arakawa, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Hisayuki Arakawa, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Hisayuki Arakawa, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Atsuhiko Isobe, Voranop Viyakarn

Summary

Researchers collected microplastic samples from surface seawater and the water column along Japan's southwest coast and assessed ecological risks using different mesh size filters. They found that risk assessment results varied by up to 100-fold at the same location depending on the mesh size used for sampling, with denser and more toxic polymers found more frequently in deeper waters. The study is the first to demonstrate that mesh selectivity critically affects microplastic risk assessments and calls for standardized sampling protocols.

Study Type Environmental

In this study, environmental microplastic samples (>30 μm) were collected from surface seawater and the water column, characterized, and used to assess ecological risks. The influence of mesh selectivity on ecological risks was also evaluated through subsampling. Results show that surface microplastic concentrations (>30 μm) range from 92 to 3306 pieces/m along Japan's southwest coast, with significant increases at Stas. 2 and 1. Subsurface vertical concentration near Okinawa ranges from 991 to 1992 pieces/m, with denser, more toxic polymers more frequently observed in deeper waters, suggesting that polymer types may be sorted by marine structure. Risk assessments revealed very high risks near main islands and populated regions, while remote regions had lower risks. Further analysis revealed that ecological risk estimates are significantly influenced by mesh selectivity, with variations in particle size distribution and polymer type composition resulting in changes of up to 100-fold at the same location when different mesh sizes were used, suggesting that current framework is not ideal for risk assessment of microplastics. This study is the first to demonstrate that samplers with different mesh sizes can lead to substantial differences in risk assessments, even at the same location. These findings underscore the critical impact of mesh selectivity on ecological risk estimates and highlight the need for standardized sampling protocols in microplastic research.

Read via DOI PubMed

Share this paper

Post Share Share Pin Email