We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Mind the leaf anatomy while taking ground truth with portable chlorophyll meters
Summary
Researchers tested four portable handheld meters used to measure leaf chlorophyll content and found they work well for broad flat leaves but perform poorly for conifer needles and narrow grass leaves due to differences in leaf structure. Scientists and ecologists using these meters for remote sensing studies should calibrate them against lab measurements for non-standard leaf types to ensure accuracy.
A wide range of portable chlorophyll meters are increasingly being used to measure leaf chlorophyll content as an indicator of plant performance, providing reference data for remote sensing studies. We tested the effect of leaf anatomy on the relationship between optical assessments of chlorophyll (Chl) against biochemically determined Chl content as a reference. Optical Chl assessments included measurements taken by four chlorophyll meters: three transmittance-based (SPAD-502, Dualex-4 Scientific, and MultispeQ 2.0), one fluorescence-based (CCM-300), and vegetation indices calculated from the 400-2500 nm leaf reflectance acquired using an ASD FieldSpec and a contact plant probe. Three leaf types with different anatomy were included: dorsiventral laminar leaves, grass leaves, and needles. On laminar leaves, all instruments performed well for chlorophyll content estimation (R2 > 0.80, nRMSE < 15%), regardless of the variation in their specific internal structure (mesomorphic, scleromorphic, or scleromorphic with hypodermis), similarly to the performance of four reflectance indices (R2 > 0.90, nRMSE < 16%). For grasses, the model to predict chlorophyll content across multiple species had low performance with CCM-300 (R2 = 0.45, nRMSE = 11%) and failed for SPAD. For Norway spruce needles, the relation of CCM-300 values to chlorophyll content was also weak (R2 = 0.45, nRMSE = 11%). To improve the accuracy of data used for remote sensing algorithm development, we recommend calibration of chlorophyll meter measurements with biochemical assessments, especially for species with anatomy other than laminar dicot leaves. The take-home message is that portable chlorophyll meters perform well for laminar leaves and grasses with wider leaves, however, their accuracy is limited for conifer needles and narrow grass leaves. Species-specific calibrations are necessary to account for anatomical variations, and adjustments in sampling protocols may be required to improve measurement reliability.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Assessment of Chlorophyll Content in Leaves of Crops and Orchards Based on SPAD, Multispectral, and Hyperspectral Techniques
This paper is not about microplastic pollution. It uses satellite imagery, spectrophotometry, and SPAD meters to assess chlorophyll content in crops and orchards in Sindh, Pakistan, demonstrating that remote sensing can reliably monitor agricultural crop health.
Development of a sampling protocol for collecting leaf surface material for multiphase chemistry studies
Researchers developed a sampling protocol for collecting water-soluble material from wet leaf surfaces for atmospheric chemistry studies, investigating how solvent-to-leaf ratios, contact time, rain occurrence, and plant metabolism affect solute concentration and composition. UV-vis absorption spectra of leaf soaks closely resembled authentic raindrops from the same trees and shared features with microbial dissolved organic matter, informing research on atmosphere-biosphere chemical interactions.
Accumulation of airborne microplastics on leaves of different tree species in the urban environment
Researchers measured airborne microplastics collected on tree leaves in urban areas of the Netherlands and Portugal, finding that needle-shaped leaves from pine and fir trees captured the most particles per surface area. Trees appear to act as natural filters for airborne microplastics, especially the smallest particles, and more plastic accumulated on leaves during dry periods. This matters for human health because airborne microplastics are a growing source of exposure through breathing.
Foliar retention of atmospheric microplastics: Influence of leaf surface properties and rainfall intensity
Researchers found that leaf surface properties and rainfall intensity significantly influence how much atmospheric microplastics are retained on plant foliage, with leaves near a landfill retaining up to 0.80 items/cm2 and autumn showing the highest seasonal accumulation across five common urban tree species.
Comparison of microplastic type, size, and composition in atmospheric and foliage samples in an urban scenario
Researchers compared microplastic contamination in outdoor air deposits and on plant leaf surfaces in an urban area and found that both sampling methods detected similar types and sizes of microplastic particles. Fibers were the most common shape found, and polyester and polyethylene were among the most frequently identified polymers. The study suggests that plant foliage could serve as a practical biomonitor for tracking airborne microplastic pollution in cities.