We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
An operational decision tree strategy optimizing the pairing of receptor model and classification approach in source apportionment of microplastics: Leveraging target source type and complexity
Summary
Researchers tested different combinations of statistical source-apportionment models and plastic classification methods to find the most reliable approach for tracing where environmental microplastics come from. The study provides a practical decision-making framework that could help regulators and scientists identify pollution sources more accurately, which is a prerequisite for targeted cleanup efforts.
Microplastics (MPs) are characterized by multiple attributes such as morphology and polymers that enable diverse classification approaches. The source apportionment of MPs is significantly different from that of traditional pollutants, whose classification relies solely on chemical composition. Current research lacks quantitative methods in microplastic source apportionment, with receptor models' reliability unverified and optimal classification approaches unclear. In this study, the performances of receptor models (Principal Component Analysis-Multiple Linear Regression (PCA-MLR) and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF)) combined with classification approaches (polymeric and morphological) across source types (primary and secondary) and complexities (2-6 sources) were evaluated based on 56 scenarios. Results showed that PCA-MLR using morphological classification failed to resolve actual source profiles in all scenarios, with the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between simulated and true profiles below 0.3. Under polymeric classification, PMF consistently yielded simulated source profiles significantly correlated with true values (p < 0.01) across all scenarios, with r ranging from 0.823-1.000. For ≤ 4 sources, PMF using morphological classification also performed well, potentially exceeding polymer-based results. The models exhibited distinct preferences in evaluating source impact intensities: PCA-MLR better resolved primary sources (r = 0.990 ± 0.013) than secondary sources (r = 0.973 ± 0.037), while PMF excelled for secondary sources (r = 0.990 ± 0.010) more than primary sources (r = 0.959 ± 0.055). Building on these findings, we developed an operational decision tree strategy optimizing model-classification pairing upon target source type and complexity. This framework significantly enhances the efficiency and accuracy of microplastic source apportionment, providing critical support for precise source-specific risk mitigation in aquatic environments.
Sign in to start a discussion.