0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Responses of soil enzyme activities to urea amendment in microplastic-impacted soils

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
F. O. Topac, M. Yalili Kilic

Summary

Researchers investigated how three types of microplastics (HDPE, PP, and PET) affect key soil enzymes involved in nutrient cycling, with and without urea fertilizer. Higher microplastic concentrations significantly reduced enzyme activities by 10-34%, with PP and HDPE causing the strongest effects. While urea partially offset the enzyme inhibition at low microplastic levels, it was unable to counteract the suppression at higher concentrations, highlighting the threat microplastics pose to soil health.

Abstract This study investigates the impact of microplastics (HDPE, PP, PET) on soil enzyme activities (urease, alkaline phosphatase, β-glucosidase), which are crucial for biogeochemical cycling, and their interaction with urea, a widely used nitrogen fertilizer. Soil samples from farmland in Bursa, Turkey, were treated with microplastics at 0%, 0.5%, and 5% concentrations and urea at 0 and 20 mg/100 g, then incubated aerobically (at 28 °C and 70% field capacity) for 60 days. Enzyme activities and pH were measured at 20, 40, and 60 days, and two-way ANOVA was used for statistical evaluation. Results showed that higher microplastic concentrations (5%) significantly reduced enzyme activities, with urease decreasing by approximately 17–33%, β-glucosidase by 14–34%, and alkaline phosphatase by 10–25%. Among microplastic types, PET had the least inhibitory effect, while PP and HDPE caused stronger reductions. Urea application partially alleviated enzyme inhibition at low microplastic concentrations, enhancing activity by 15–20%, but failed to counteract suppression at higher doses. These findings highlight the disruptive impact of microplastics on soil biochemical processes, reducing nutrient cycling efficiency and compromising soil health. While urea application offers some mitigation, its effectiveness is limited in microplastic-contaminated soils. This study underscores the urgent need for integrated soil management strategies to minimize the dual threats of microplastic pollution and declining fertilizer efficiency, ensuring long-term soil sustainability.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Meta Analysis Tier 1

Microplastic effects on soil nitrogen cycling enzymes: A global meta-analysis of environmental and edaphic factors

This large-scale meta-analysis of 147 studies found that microplastics in soil significantly increased urease and leucine aminopeptidase enzyme activities by about 8%, potentially disrupting nitrogen cycling. Biodegradable microplastics had more pronounced effects than conventional plastics, and responses depended on soil pH, polymer type, particle size, and concentration.

Article Tier 2

The effects of three different microplastics on enzyme activities and microbial communities in soil

Researchers added three types of microplastics (film PE, fiber PP, and sphere PP) to loamy and sandy soils and measured effects on enzyme activities and microbial communities, finding that all three types altered microbial community structure and nutrient-cycling enzyme activities in soil-type-dependent ways.

Article Tier 2

Inhibitory effect of microplastics on soil extracellular enzymatic activities by changing soil properties and direct adsorption: An investigation at the aggregate-fraction level

Researchers studied how polyethylene microplastics affect the activity of soil enzymes over 150 days, examining responses across different soil aggregate sizes. They found that microplastics inhibited enzyme activities by altering soil properties, directly adsorbing enzymes, and competing with microorganisms for space. The study reveals that microplastic pollution can undermine key biological processes that maintain soil quality, with different soil aggregate fractions responding in distinct ways.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Can Decrease Enzyme Activities and Microbes in Soil

In a laboratory experiment, adding microplastics to soil significantly reduced beneficial soil bacteria and the activity of key enzymes needed for nutrient cycling, with effects worsening at higher microplastic concentrations. Enzyme activities dropped by 32% to 50% depending on the enzyme type. This matters for human health because degraded soil biology means less productive farmland and potentially reduced nutritional quality of food crops grown in microplastic-contaminated soil.

Article Tier 2

LDPE microplastic films alter microbial community composition and enzymatic activities in soil

Polyethylene microplastic films were added to soil at 2000 fragments/kg and effects on enzymatic activities and bacterial communities were measured over 90 days, with urease and catalase activities significantly increased after 15 days and alpha diversity of soil bacteria reduced. The study indicates that LDPE microplastics alter soil microbial function and community structure, with potential consequences for nutrient cycling.

Share this paper