We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
0
Article
?
AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button.
Tier 2
?
Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence.
Sign in to save
Assessment of Four Artificial Methods for Aging Plastic Mulch Films According to Efficiency, Rate, and Similarity to Natural Field-Aged Plastics
Journal of Polymers and the Environment
2025
4 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 48
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Davey L. Jones,
Martine Graf,
Michaela K. Reay,
Martine Graf,
Martine Graf,
Martine Graf,
Michaela K. Reay,
Michaela K. Reay,
Michaela K. Reay,
Martine Graf,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
Michaela K. Reay,
David R. Chadwick
Michaela K. Reay,
David R. Chadwick
Michaela K. Reay,
Martine Graf,
Michaela K. Reay,
Martine Graf,
Martine Graf,
Martine Graf,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Michaela K. Reay,
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Athanasios Dimitriou,
Michaela K. Reay,
Michaela K. Reay,
Martine Graf,
Martine Graf,
Martine Graf,
Martine Graf,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
Martine Graf,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
Michaela K. Reay,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
Michaela K. Reay,
Athanasios Dimitriou,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
Davey L. Jones,
David R. Chadwick
Summary
Researchers compared four laboratory methods for artificially aging plastic mulch films — thin sheets used in agriculture that break into microplastics — to determine which best mimics how the films degrade naturally in farm fields. Identifying faster, more accurate aging tests helps scientists predict how quickly agricultural plastics will fragment and enter the soil.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10924-024-03481-5.
Sign in to start a discussion.