We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Evaluation of Ceramic Membrane Filtration for Alternatives to Microplastics in Cosmetic Formulations Using FlowCam Analysis
Summary
Ceramic membrane crossflow filtration was evaluated for removing silica powder and cornstarch—common microplastic alternatives in cosmetics—with FlowCam particle analysis revealing high removal efficiency and insights into particle behavior that can guide greener cosmetic formulation strategies.
The rapid expansion of the cosmetics industry has significantly increased the adoption of alternative microplastics in response to increasingly stringent global environmental regulations. This study presents a comparative analysis of the treatment performance of silica powder and cornstarch-common alternatives for microplastics in cosmetics-using ceramic membrane filtration combined with flow imaging microscopy (FlowCam) to analyze particle behavior. Bench-scale crossflow filtration experiments were performed with commercially available alumina ceramic membranes. By analyzing high-resolution images from FlowCam, the transport and retention behaviors of the two microplastic alternatives were examined by comparing their morphological properties. Despite their similar particle sizes, the cornstarch demonstrated a higher removal efficiency (82%) than the silica (72%) in the ceramic membrane filtration due to its greater tendency to aggregate. This increased tendency for aggregation suggests that cornstarch may contribute to faster fouling, while the stability and uniformity of silica particles result in less fouling. The FlowCam analysis revealed that the cornstarch particles experienced a slight increase in circularity and compactness over time, likely due to physical swelling and aggregation, while the silica particles retained their shape and structural integrity. These findings highlight the impact of the morphological properties of alternative microplastics on their filtration behavior and fouling potential.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Screening for subvisible particles in pharmaceutical formulations – a case study
This study applied flow imaging microscopy to detect and characterize subvisible particles in pharmaceutical formulations — a quality control challenge that shares methodological overlap with microplastic detection. Improved particle characterization methods in the pharmaceutical sector can also advance techniques for identifying nanoplastics in biological and environmental samples.
Removal of Microplastics and Performance of a Developed Ceramic Filter
Researchers developed a ceramic filter from clay and waste glass with varying porogenic agent content and firing temperatures, then evaluated water permeability, element leaching, and microplastic removal efficiency. The formulation without a porogenic agent achieved the highest microplastic removal rate of nearly 99.8%, demonstrating that optimizing porosity and filtration pressure is key to effective and affordable microplastic filtration.
Investigations on the Particle Fouling and Backwash Efficiency During Microplastic Microfiltration–Particle Size Aspects
Researchers characterised polystyrene microplastic microfiltration through cellulose acetate membranes, testing particle and pore sizes in comparable ranges to challenge dead-end filtration. Particle size relative to pore size strongly influenced fouling behaviour, and backwashing efficiency varied with particle characteristics, informing filtration system design for MP removal.
Characterisation, quantity and sorptive properties of microplastics extracted from cosmetics
Researchers extracted microplastics from a specific environmental matrix and characterized their properties — including size, shape, polymer type, and sorption capacity — providing insights into the physical and chemical behavior of environmentally weathered particles.
A Comparison of Different Approaches for Characterizing Microplastics in Selected Personal Care Products
Researchers compared particle size analysis, light microscopy, and imaging flow cytometry combined with micro-FTIR spectroscopy for characterizing microplastics in personal care products, finding that methodology choice significantly affects quantification results and highlighting the need for standardized approaches.