0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Life Cycle Assessment of Proofing Test Production on Printing Surfaces with Use of Carbon Footprint Methodology

Applied Sciences 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jacek Nogacki, Zuzanna Żołek‐Tryznowska Zuzanna Żołek‐Tryznowska Jacek Nogacki, Urban Buschmann, Urban Buschmann, Krzysztof Krystosiak, Zuzanna Żołek‐Tryznowska

Summary

Researchers conducted a life cycle assessment comparing the environmental impact of digital proof printing versus traditional hard proofing methods used in the printing industry. They found that digital proofing generated significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions and consumed fewer raw materials. The study highlights that shifting to digital proofing processes can reduce the printing industry's carbon footprint and its reliance on plastic-containing consumables.

This study represents a pioneering initiative in the printing industry, especially in Poland, which assessed the environmental impacts and eco-efficiency of proof printing through the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The process of proof printing on a target substrate was compared with the traditional hard proofing process, which requires trial printing in production conditions. The analysis adhered to the ISO 14040 and 14044 standards, assessing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, raw material use (e.g., plastics, water), and environmental toxicity. The innovative proofing on the target substrate process exhibits a lower environmental impact, as confirmed by the GHG emissions and plastic and water demand of the process. The GHG emissions were reduced from 2610 kg of CO2e to 68.4 kg of CO2e per functional unit (FU). The water demand for the proofing on the target substrate process was 40 times lower, and the plastic demand was also 40 times lower, decreasing to 20 kg per FU. The toxicity impact of the method based on the proofing system on the target substrate on living organisms is more than six times lower than that of the conventional method. The proof printing on the target substrate process offers an environmentally friendly alternative to the traditional hard proofing process, with lower GHG emissions and a lower environmental impact.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper