0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Hazard assessment of airborne and foodborne biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates microplastics and non-biodegradable polypropylene microplastics

Environment International 2025 20 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 73 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Hua Zha, Lanjuan Li, Shengjie Li, Aoxiang Zhuge, Jian Shen, Yuanyuan Yao, Kevin Chang

Summary

A mouse study compared biodegradable PHA plastic particles to conventional polypropylene microplastics and found both types caused harm to the lungs, liver, and gut when inhaled or eaten. However, the biodegradable PHA particles caused notably less damage than polypropylene, suggesting that while biodegradable plastics are not harmless, they may pose lower health risks than traditional plastics.

Polymers
Models

Microplastics (MP) are ubiquitous in the environment, and are toxic to various living organisms. Proper application of biodegradable plastics may alleviate the hazards of conventional non-biodegradable plastics. In the current study, multi-omics analyses were performed to compare the biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) and non-biodegradable polypropylene (PP) MP for their toxicity on mouse liver and lung. Airborne PHA MP induced nasal microbiome dysbiosis, pulmonary microbiome alteration, pulmonary and serum metabolome disruption, and hepatic transcriptome disturbances, resulting in mild pulmonary toxicity. By contrast, airborne PP MP caused greater alterations in nasal and pulmonary microbiome, pulmonary and serum metabolome, and hepatic transcriptome, resulting in pulmonary and hepatic toxicity. Both foodborne PHA and PP MP caused intestinal microbiome dysbiosis, while foodborne PHA MP caused slighter intestinal and serum metabolome disruption, hepatic transcriptome disturbances and hepatotoxicity (e.g., lower serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase) compared to foodborne PP MP. Some potential differential biomarkers were determined between PP and PHA MP exposures, i.e., nasal Allobaculum and pulmonary Alloprevotella for airborne PHA; nasal Lactobacillus and pulmonary Acinetobacter for airborne PP; intestinal Faecalibacterium for foodborne PHA; and intestinal unclassified_Erysipelatoclostridiaceae for foodborne PP. The results show that PHA MP can induce less pulmonary and hepatic toxicity compared to PP MP, suggesting PHA is a potential substitution for PP. The findings can benefit the hazard assessment of airborne and foodborne PHA and PP MP.

Share this paper

Discussion

Log in to join the discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.