0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Natural substrates and amphipods epibionts contaminated by microplastic

Acta Scientiae et Technicae 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, André R. Senna Rayane Sorrentino, André R. Senna Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, Rayane Sorrentino, André R. Senna

Summary

Researchers sampled three natural substrates (algae, sponges, and ascidians) and their associated amphipod epibionts on rocky shores in Brazil to compare microplastic abundance, finding that organisms interacting with and filtering microplastics may transfer contamination to associated epibiont communities.

Amphipods inhabit microhabitats that protect them against predation, provide nutrition and an area for reproduction and development. However, the compounds of the ecosystem are impacted by the presence of microplastics (MPs), which are a threat to marine communities. Since the organisms interact with and ingest/filter the different quantities of MPs, and may make it available to the associated epibionts, three natural substrates (algae, sponges, and ascidians) were sampled to compare the number of MPs in them and in their associated amphipods. This study was conducted on rocky shores from Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), differently from other studies that have been focused on experimental tests. The samples were submitted to density separation to extract the microplastics and acid degradation to access MP in amphipods. Algae retained a greater concentration of MPs as a sink of particles, as well as its associated amphipods. Sponges and ascidians have different mechanisms to filter water, which influences the MPs accumulation in amphipods. Those associated with sponges and ascidians had fewer microplastic particles. This is the first study comparing the retention of MP in different natural substrates and their amphipod epibionts, which gives information about microplastic contamination in these microhabitats and their associated organisms.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper