0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Acute toxicity of natural and synthetic clothing fibers towards Daphnia magna: Influence of fiber type and morphology

The Science of The Total Environment 2025 5 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested the toxicity of natural and synthetic clothing fibers on small freshwater organisms (Daphnia magna) and found that nylon microfibers were acutely toxic, while natural fibers like cotton and silk caused no significant harm. Smoother fibers were more toxic than frayed ones, and the actual ingestion of fibers mattered more than how many were present in the water. These findings are important because textile fibers make up a large portion of microplastics in waterways and can enter the human food chain through contaminated aquatic organisms.

Polymers
Body Systems
Models

Environmental consequences of plastic pollution have come under scrutiny over the past 20 years as stewardship of the biosphere has risen in popularity. Microplastic research has focused on fragmented particles from hard plastics with limited research focused on microfibers released from textiles, which constitute a significant portion of microplastics in aquatic environments. The present study investigated hazards associated with two natural microfibers (cotton and silk) and four synthetic microfibers (acrylonitrile, Kevlar, nylon, and polyester) towards Daphnia magna. Results demonstrated that toxicity is dependent on the polymer type and morphology. Natural microfibers had no significant effects on D. magna whereas nylon microfibers were acutely toxic. While the total number of microfibers in exposure chambers contributed to microfiber ingestion and toxicity, suspended microfibers were weakly correlated to microfiber ingestion and toxicity. Microfibers with smoother surfaces were more toxic than microfibers that were frayed. Toxicity was more strongly related to microfiber ingestion than exposure concentration, suggesting that microfiber uptake is an important measurement endpoint for characterizing effects. Research with longer exposure times and emphasis on endpoints other than survival, such as uptake and retention of microfibers, feeding rates, growth and development, and reproduction are needed to understand the ecotoxicity of microfibers.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Effects of synthetic and natural microfibers on Daphnia magna–Are they dependent on microfiber type?

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the effects of synthetic microfibers (polyester and polypropylene) and natural microfibers (lyocell) on the water flea Daphnia magna. The study found that even natural microfibers caused significant harm, including reduced gut microvilli length, impaired nutrient absorption, growth inhibition, and mortality, confirming that microfiber toxicity is not limited to synthetic materials.

Article Tier 2

Multi-level approach to investigate sublethal effects caused by synthetic and natural microfibers on Daphnia magna

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed freshwater organisms including amphipods and oligochaetes to synthetic and natural microfibers at multiple levels of biological organization, finding that both fiber types caused sublethal physiological and behavioral effects, with synthetic fibers generally producing greater harm.

Article Tier 2

Uptake and effects of microplastic textile fibers on freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed the freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna to ground PET textile microfibers for 48 hours and found that fiber ingestion increased mortality in food-deprived organisms and that daphnids could not recover after transfer to clean water, providing the first evidence of PET textile microfiber bioavailability and toxicity in a standard ecotoxicology model.

Article Tier 2

Difference in sensitivity of Daphnia magna to pristine and aged microplastic fibers

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the acute and chronic toxicity of pristine versus UV-aged polyamide, polyacrylonitrile, and polyester microplastic fibers on the freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna, also testing natural wool and cellulose fibers as references. Aged plastic fibers showed different toxicity profiles than unaged fibers, with effects on survival, reproduction, growth, and oxygen consumption.

Article Tier 2

Cotton and polyester microfibers cause chronic toxicity in the freshwater invertebrate Chironomus dilutus

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the chronic toxicity of cotton and polyester microfibers on the freshwater invertebrate Chironomus dilutus, testing both clean fibers and fibers soaked in wastewater treatment effluent. The study found that both fiber types caused toxic effects, highlighting that microfiber pollution in aquatic environments is not limited to synthetic plastics and that associated chemicals can increase toxicity.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper