We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Acute toxicity of natural and synthetic clothing fibers towards Daphnia magna: Influence of fiber type and morphology
Summary
Researchers tested the toxicity of natural and synthetic clothing fibers on small freshwater organisms (Daphnia magna) and found that nylon microfibers were acutely toxic, while natural fibers like cotton and silk caused no significant harm. Smoother fibers were more toxic than frayed ones, and the actual ingestion of fibers mattered more than how many were present in the water. These findings are important because textile fibers make up a large portion of microplastics in waterways and can enter the human food chain through contaminated aquatic organisms.
Environmental consequences of plastic pollution have come under scrutiny over the past 20 years as stewardship of the biosphere has risen in popularity. Microplastic research has focused on fragmented particles from hard plastics with limited research focused on microfibers released from textiles, which constitute a significant portion of microplastics in aquatic environments. The present study investigated hazards associated with two natural microfibers (cotton and silk) and four synthetic microfibers (acrylonitrile, Kevlar, nylon, and polyester) towards Daphnia magna. Results demonstrated that toxicity is dependent on the polymer type and morphology. Natural microfibers had no significant effects on D. magna whereas nylon microfibers were acutely toxic. While the total number of microfibers in exposure chambers contributed to microfiber ingestion and toxicity, suspended microfibers were weakly correlated to microfiber ingestion and toxicity. Microfibers with smoother surfaces were more toxic than microfibers that were frayed. Toxicity was more strongly related to microfiber ingestion than exposure concentration, suggesting that microfiber uptake is an important measurement endpoint for characterizing effects. Research with longer exposure times and emphasis on endpoints other than survival, such as uptake and retention of microfibers, feeding rates, growth and development, and reproduction are needed to understand the ecotoxicity of microfibers.
Discussion
Log in to join the discussion