0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Combined toxicity of microplastic fibers and dibutyl phthalate on algae: Synergistic or antagonistic?

Aquatic Toxicology 2025 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 63 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Zhe Wang, Zhen Zhou, Yangyang Liang, Le Liang, Xiaotao Zhou, Su Min, Su Min, Xiaotao Zhou, Yangyang Liang, Zhongguan Jiang Le Liang, Zhongguan Jiang Su Min, Le Liang, Le Liang, Zhe Wang, Su Min, Zhe Wang, Zhen Zhou, Su Min, Le Liang, Su Min, Zhen Zhou, Zhongguan Jiang Yangyang Liang, Xiaotao Zhou, Xiaotao Zhou, Yangyang Liang, Yangyang Liang, Zhongguan Jiang Zhongguan Jiang Yangyang Liang, Zhongguan Jiang Zhongguan Jiang Zhongguan Jiang Zhongguan Jiang

Summary

This study found that when microplastic fibers and the plasticizer DBP (a chemical commonly added to plastics) are combined, they cause more damage to freshwater algae than either pollutant alone. The combination produced a synergistic toxic effect, meaning the harm was greater than simply adding the effects of each pollutant together. Since both microplastic fibers and plasticizers are widespread in freshwater environments, their combined presence could threaten the base of aquatic food chains.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Plastics, combined with plasticizers, have been widely utilized worldwide. Microplastic fibers (MPFs) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) account for the most predominant microplastics and plasticizers detected in freshwater ecosystem, with their joint toxicity being limited studied. In this study, we employed freshwater algae (Chlorella vulgaris) as toxicity test model organism to assess their growth, photosynthesis, metabolism, and oxidative response when exposing to different concentrations of polypropylene MPFs and the co-exposure of DBP. In addition, the toxic interaction between MPFs and DBP was assessed by combining the integrated toxicity value (Integrated Biomarker Response version 2, IBRv2) and the mixture toxicity index (Effect Addition Index, EAI). Our results demonstrated significant toxic effects of MPFs and DBP on C. vulgaris, and highlighted their dynamic interactions with C. vulgaris. Specifically, when combining with DBP, MPFs with high concentrations exhibited significantly increase in algae growth inhibition, photosynthetic pigment contents (Chl-a, Chl-b, and carotenoids), protein contents, and oxidative enzymes (SOD, CAT, and MDA). In terms of integrated toxicity values, higher IBRv2 values were recorded by the combined exposure of MPFs and DBP in contrast with the sole exposure groups, indicating that the combined exposure caused more severe damage to photosynthesis, oxidation and metabolism. In addition, our study recorded synergistic combined toxicity when MPFs were in high concentrations, whereas antagonistic combined toxicity when MPFs were in low concentrations. Our study highlights the MPFs concentration-dependent combined toxicity (synergistic or antagonistic) when exposing to microplastics and plasticizers in freshwater ecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper