0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Remediation Sign in to save

Degradation and ecotoxicity of favipiravir and oseltamivir in the presence of microplastics during ozonation and catalytic ozonation of synthetic municipal wastewater effluents

Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 2025 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Nasim Chavoshi, Serdar Doǧruel, Nilay Bilgin‐Saritas, Nasim Chavoshi, Nasim Chavoshi, Emel Topuz Emel Topuz Emel Topuz Emel Topuz Serdar Doǧruel, Nasim Chavoshi, Emel Topuz Nilay Bilgin‐Saritas, Emel Topuz Nilay Bilgin‐Saritas, Elif Pehlivanoğlu-Mantaş, Alireza Khataee, Alireza Khataee, Emel Topuz Emel Topuz Elif Pehlivanoğlu-Mantaş, Emel Topuz Emel Topuz Elif Pehlivanoğlu-Mantaş, Alireza Khataee, Emel Topuz Elif Pehlivanoğlu-Mantaş, Emel Topuz Emel Topuz

Summary

Researchers tested whether ozone-based water treatment could effectively remove antiviral drugs from wastewater, both with and without microplastics present. They found that ozonation removed up to 84% of favipiravir and 64% of oseltamivir, but the presence of microplastics reduced degradation rates by 30-40%. The study suggests that microplastics in wastewater may interfere with advanced treatment processes, making it harder to fully eliminate pharmaceutical contaminants.

Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

Abstract Background Favipiravir (FAV) and oseltamivir (OSE) are antiviral agents developed against influenza and they were repurposed against SARS‐CoV‐2 during the COVID‐19 pandemic. This study evaluated the potential of ozonation and catalytic ozonation as tertiary treatment approaches for removing FAV and OSE from municipal wastewaters, both in the presence and absence of microplastics (MPs), while comparing the ecotoxicity of untreated and treated secondary effluents to predict the ecotoxicological effects of these technologies during municipal wastewater treatment. Results At an initial antiviral concentration of 50 μg L −1 , ozonation at pH 7 with a specific ozone dose of 0.6 mg O 3 (mg DOC) −1 yielded FAV and OSE removals of 84 and 64%, respectively, while the presence of catalyst or MPs decreased the degradation rate by 30–40%. Raising the pH to 10 had minimal impact on FAV abatement, but improved OSE reduction by 21%. Acute toxicity tests using Vibrio fischeri demonstrated that simultaneous ozonation of the analytes led to the accumulation of transformation products (TPs) of FAV and OSE, with their combined effect almost equal to that of the original compounds. Reproduction toxicity tests indicated that TPs of antiviral drugs generated during ozonation were less toxic to Enchytraeus crypticus than the parent chemicals. Conclusion Ozonation proved to be a viable option for upgrading existing wastewater treatment facilities, serving as a complementary treatment to minimize the release of antivirals from municipal secondary effluents and reduce their inhibitory effect on earthworm reproduction, thereby enhancing the reuse potential of treated wastewater for irrigation. © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper