0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

From mudflats and saltpans to Open Sea: Plastic ingestion and PBDE/MeO-BDE accumulation in Waterbirds from southern Portugal

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sara N Veríssimo, Vítor H. Paiva, Sara C. Cunha, Ana Laura Brandão, João Coentro, José O. Fernandes, Jaqueline Magalhães Pereira, Luís A. E. Batista de Carvalho, Lara R Cerveira, M. Paula M. Marques, Vítor Silva, Ana Cláudia Norte, Jaime A. Ramos

Summary

Researchers studied plastic ingestion and flame retardant chemical accumulation in breeding waterbirds from a coastal lagoon in southern Portugal. They found microplastics in regurgitated pellets and droppings from multiple species, with gulls and terns ingesting the most particles. The study also detected persistent flame retardant chemicals in eggs, feathers, and preen oil, suggesting that plastic pollution exposes coastal birds to both physical and chemical hazards across their feeding habitats.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic ingestion greatly affects waterbirds, causing lacerations and potentially leading to health disruptions from chemical leaching. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), used as flame retardants in plastics, remain persistent in the environment despite restrictions, along with the less studied methoxylated PBDEs (MeO-BDEs), that may result from their transformation. Since most plastic pollution in the heavily impacted marine environment comes from terrestrial sources, freshwater/estuarine and coastal environments can also be heavily exposed to contamination. Nonetheless, research in these areas remains limited. We studied the breeding waterbird community from Ria Formosa (Algarve, Portugal) as a proxy of such contamination and sampled the wader species feeding in mudflats and saltpans, little terns feeding in lagoon channels and the adjacent sea, opportunistic gulls feeding mostly on fishery discards and landfills and marine foraging gulls feeding exclusively at sea. Specifically, we assessed 1) plastic ingestion, through the analysis of regurgitations and faeces, and 2) PBDEs and MeO-BDES uptake in eggs, feathers, and preen oil. Results showed that, overall, microplastics were the most commonly detected particles. Yellow-legged gulls (Larus michahellis) and little terns (Sternula albifrons) ingested more particles, especially fibres. Eggs of black-winged stilt (Himantopus himantopus) and yellow-legged gull had higher PBDEs concentrations, while MeO-BDEs did not differ among species. Feathers exhibited low detection values, but MeO-BDEs suggests marine invertebrates' consumption. Little terns accumulated more PBDEs and MeO-BDEs, suggesting an association between plastic ingestion and contamination load. However, species-specific traits, dietary preferences, and foraging areas should also be taken into consideration.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Plastic ingestion in aquatic birds in Portugal

Plastic was found in the stomachs of multiple species of aquatic birds in Portugal, with seabirds more likely to contain plastic than freshwater birds. The findings confirm that birds across Portuguese aquatic environments are routinely ingesting plastic, making them useful sentinels for monitoring plastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Presence of plastic particles in waterbirds faeces collected in Spanish lakes

Researchers analyzed feces from three waterbird species (coot, mallard, shelduck) at five inland wetlands in Spain, finding plastic debris in 44–60% of individuals, suggesting that freshwater waterfowl ingest plastic at frequencies comparable to marine seabirds, likely from agricultural plastic debris surrounding the lakes.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Plastic pollution threatens shorebirds: a global review

This systematic review summarizes global research on how plastic pollution threatens shorebirds through ingestion and entanglement. The findings highlight that microplastics are spreading throughout coastal ecosystems, and since shorebirds serve as indicators of environmental health, their contamination signals broader risks to the food webs that also affect human communities.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics ingestion and endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) by breeding seabirds in the east tropical Atlantic: Associations with trophic and foraging proxies (δ15N and δ13C)

Scientists studied five species of tropical seabirds and found endocrine-disrupting chemicals in every species tested, including flame retardants, UV filters, and musk fragrances. Birds that ingested more microplastics tended to carry higher levels of certain contaminants, suggesting plastics may act as a delivery mechanism for harmful chemicals. The findings raise concerns about how plastic pollution in the ocean is exposing wildlife to a cocktail of hormone-disrupting substances.

Article Tier 2

Shorebird droppings analysis: Microplastics and heavy metals in a key conservation reserve and adjoining sand beaches in the west coast of India

Researchers analyzed droppings from ten migratory shorebird species at a conservation reserve on India's west coast and found microplastics and heavy metals in samples from all species. The contamination levels varied by species and season, reflecting differences in diet and habitat use. Since shorebirds are top predators in coastal food webs, their contamination indicates widespread microplastic and heavy metal pollution throughout the coastal ecosystem.

Share this paper