0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Identification of microplastics in the aquatic environment, or in the presence of algae Chlorella sp., by comparison of biophotonic methods

Polymer Testing 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 43 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Alžbeta Chorvátová, Alžbeta Chorvátová, Alžbeta Chorvátová, Alžbeta Chorvátová, Alžbeta Chorvátová, M.A. Garcia Bucio, M.A. Garcia Bucio, D. Chorvát, D. Chorvát, Z. Jurašeková, Z. Jurašeková, Dmitrij Bondarev, Eva Noskovičová, Dmitrij Bondarev, Alžbeta Chorvátová, Eva Noskovičová, L. Nulandaya, L. Nulandaya, D. Chorvát, Dmitrij Bondarev, Dmitrij Bondarev, Dmitrij Bondarev, D. Chorvát, Pavol Miškovský

Summary

Researchers compared multiple light-based (biophotonic) methods — including FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, and fluorescence microscopy — for identifying microplastics in water samples containing algae, which can make detection much harder. They found that combining multiple methods improves accuracy and allows for real-world monitoring of microplastics in complex aquatic environments where other organic material is present.

Microplastics (MPs) are emerging pollutants in our environment. However, their identification under real environmental conditions remains challenging, particularly in the case of MPs found in water sources, where other organic materials, such as algae, are present. Custom-prepared MPs (PET, PS, PLA) - commonly found in the aquatic environment – were tested in the dry state, in the water colloidal solutions, and/or in the presence of algae Chlorella sp. A multi-method approach, comparing different biophotonic methods, including FTIR, Raman (conventional or Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS)) and spectrally-resolved confocal fluorescence microscopy methods were employed. We tested the capabilities of the applied methods to detect the presence of MPs in complex environmental conditions and thus the possibilities for their use for an in-situ effective monitoring. • Identification of microplastics remains challenging in the aquatic environment and/or in the presence of organic material. • A multimethod approach is used including FTIR, Raman (also SERS) and spectrally-resolved fluorescence microscopy. • The presence of microplastics is detected in complex environmental conditions to allow their in-situ effective monitoring.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper