0
Article Tier 2 Nanoplastics Sign in to save

In vitro cell-transforming capacity of micro- and nanoplastics derived from 3D-printing waste

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2025 2 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested whether micro- and nanoplastics from degraded 3D-printed objects could trigger cancer-like cell changes using a validated laboratory assay. Despite being taken up by cells, none of the plastic particles -- including those containing carbon nanotubes or silver nanoparticles -- caused cancerous transformation in the test system. While the results are reassuring for this specific endpoint, the study notes that certain gene expression changes were observed, warranting further investigation into other potential health effects.

Polymers
Models
Study Type In vitro

The increasing use of plastic polymers in 3D printing applications may lead to human exposure to micro- and nanoplastics (MNPLs), raising concerns regarding adverse health consequences such as cancer induction. Little attention has been given to MNPLs originated at the end of the life cycle of 3D-printed objects because of the mechanical and environmental degradation of plastic waste. This study assessed the carcinogenic potential of secondary MNPLs generated through cryomilling of 3D objects using the validated in vitro Bhas 42 cell transformation assay (CTA). Three-dimensional objects were printed using four types of polycarbonate (PC)- and polypropylene (PP)-modified thermoplastic filaments, undoped and doped with single-walled carbon nanotubes (PC-CNT) and silver nanoparticles (PP-Ag), respectively. MNPLs (< 5 µm) generated following a three-step top-down process were thoroughly characterized. Bhas 42 cells were treated once (initiation assay) or repeatedly (promotion assay) with several concentrations of MNPLs (3.125-100 µg/mL) mimicking realistic exposure conditions, and transformed foci formation was evaluated after 21 days. Furthermore, cellular internalization and the mRNA expression of seven genes previously recognized as part of a predictive early cell transformation signature were also evaluated. Despite being internalized, none of the particles was able to initiate or promote in vitro cell transformation, regardless of doping with nanomaterials. Alternatively, all the particles significantly increased and decreased the mRNA expression of Prl2c3 and Timp4, respectively, under promotion conditions, indicating early changes that occur before the formation of transformed foci. These findings suggest that the test MNPLs could have a tumorigenic potential despite not showing morphological changes in Bhas 42 cells.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

5 Exploring the Carcinogenic Potential of Nanoplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

This study used a validated cell transformation assay to test whether polystyrene, PET, and PLA nanoplastics can initiate or promote the early stages of cancer development in vitro. Preliminary results showed polystyrene did not appear carcinogenic in this test, but significant data gaps remain for PET and PLA, which are among the most widely used plastics in everyday packaging and electronics.

Article Tier 2

In vitro cell-transforming potential of secondary polyethylene terephthalate and polylactic acid nanoplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested whether tiny nanoplastic particles from common PET plastic bottles could promote cancer development in lab cells. They found that PET nanoplastics acted as a tumor promoter, meaning they helped already-damaged cells grow into cancerous ones, even though a "biodegradable" alternative (polylactic acid) did not show the same effect. This raises concerns about long-term cancer risks from the nanoplastic particles that break off from everyday plastic bottles.

Article Tier 2

Micro and nanoplastics in human carcinogenesis: Insights from in vitro studies

AI summary Read the abstract

This narrative review compiles in vitro evidence on the carcinogenic effects of micro- and nanoplastics across multiple cancer types, examining mechanisms including oxidative stress, DNA damage, immune dysregulation, and epigenetic changes identified in cell culture experiments.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics and human cancer risk: A comprehensive review of environmental, molecular, and nanotoxicological perspectives

AI summary Read the abstract

This review pulls together lab research suggesting tiny plastic particles in our environment could damage cells, cause inflammation, and disrupt processes linked to cancer growth. While these findings raise real concern, scientists still lack direct proof that microplastics cause cancer in humans, so more long-term research is needed before drawing firm conclusions.

Article Tier 2

Cellular responses to micro- and nanoplastics exposure: mechanisms and pathophysiological implications

AI summary Read the abstract

This review summarizes existing research on how tiny plastic particles interact with cells in lab and animal studies, finding repeated signs of cell stress, including damage to cell structures and inflammation. Studies also detected plastic material in human blood and tissue samples, but the review states this does not prove the particles cause specific diseases.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper